News
May 28, 2008
Hospitals oppose heart plan
Smaller facilities want to offer heart procedures
Advertisement - Your ad here

West Virginia's largest hospitals are lining up against the state's latest proposal to allow smaller hospitals to perform life-saving heart procedures.

Executives at the big hospitals say the West Virginia Health Care Authority's proposed cardiac catheterization standards would put patients in danger and drive up health care costs.

The proposal would allow community hospitals to offer life-saving procedures, such as angioplasties, to unclog blocked and narrowed arteries to the heart, even though the facilities don't have backup cardiac surgery units.

Only six hospitals in the state offer open-heart surgery. Last week, three of those - Charleston Area Medical Center, St. Mary's Hospital in Huntington and Wheeling Hospital - sent letters to the Health Care Authority opposing the new standards.

"You're setting up false expectations," said CAMC Chief Executive Officer David Ramsey on Tuesday. "The quality will not be what it should be."

The Health Care Authority is reviewing comments from hospital executives across the state. The agency's board could vote on the proposed changes as early as June 11.

In 2002, the authority approved three demonstration sites - Saint Francis Hospital in Charleston, Weirton Medical Center and United Hospital Center in Clarksburg - to see whether heart catheterizations could be done without surgery backup. The agency hired a consultant to evaluate the pilot programs, and the hospitals got high marks.

Cardiologists at Saint Francis are performing about 400 artery-opening procedures a year. 

"It's a procedure that can be done safely, and it can save your life," said Dan Lauffer, chief executive officer at Saint Francis. "West Virginia has the highest rate of heart disease in the nation. This can improve access."

Lauffer said 28 states already allow hospitals to perform angioplasties without on-site heart surgery backup.

Executives at the larger hospitals say smaller hospitals won't have enough patients to maintain high-quality programs.

They cite a recent American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association study that found heart patients were better off at hospitals where heart specialists perform large numbers of life-saving catheterizations - at least 400 a year.

Advertisement - Your ad here
Report a violation or offensive comment.
[X] Close
to report abuse.
Posted By: Been There - Flown That (6:14pm 05-28-2008)
Report Abuse


Trust me, this is a really bad idea. During a couple decades of experience working with the state's emergency medical helicopter service I have flown countless patients from smaller hospitals with cath labs to larger facilities. We take them right off the table - with cords and lines still hanging out of them - and fly them to a location where someone can actually fix their problem.

Kentucky went down this road about ten years ago. Bring them in, do the cath, fly them out to a higher level of care. It simply makes no sense. Take them to where they can be fixed in the first place.

Lets talk cash, shall we? Do cardiac services make money for big hospitals? You betcha. But those dollars help support things like trauma care for the uninsured ATV rider who tips some beer with his buddies and says "Hey boys, watch this!" I see them everyday. Take away those cardiac dollars and even more could change.

Every hospital has its place. Cath labs should not be in small facilities.

Posted By: Stacy (12:19am 05-28-2008)
Report Abuse


I'm on the fence. On the one hand, it would be great if the smaller community hospitals could provide more services and give rural people greater access to health care, especially if it's life-saving. I kind of agree that the big hospitals are trying to block it because they don't want to lose business. I seriously doubt the administrators of CAMC or St. Mary's really care that much about quality patient care. West Virginians should have more access to health care and more options, not less.

Posted By: Augustus (10:53am 05-28-2008)
Report Abuse


I can tell you from personal experience that this is a horrible idea.

Last year my mother had an angioplasty procedure scheduled at Raleigh General Hospital. The doctor performed the procedure and sent my mother home the same day without correcting the blockages. Later that night she suffered a heart attack and was flown to CAMC where it was discovered that the collagen plug in her femoral artery was leaking and a huge clot had formed on the inside of the artery. Ten days later my mom came home after a near brush with death. Had she been taken to CAMC in the first place this could have been avoided.

My point is this: If the hospital does not have the ability to correct the problems that they find, they are going to do much more harm than good. Let the large hospitals take care of these most serious of conditions and let the little hospitals take care of minor issues. After all no one goes to a walk in clinic for brain surgery.

Posted By: Alima Zimmer (9:26am 05-28-2008)
Report Abuse


I HOPE THAT SMALLER HOSPITALS WILL BE ALLOWED TO APPLY WHATEVER MEDICAL METHODS NECESSARY REGARDING CARDIAC PROCEDURES, IN ORDER TO SAVE LIVES. THE CITIZENS OF WEST VIRGINIA ARE DESERVING OF SUCH CARE.

It's easy to follow the top stories with home delivery of The Charleston Gazette.

Click here to order home delivery.

Advertisement - Your ad here