News
June 14, 2008
WVU dumps its consultant
Action follows scathing report on health sciences program

West Virginia University officials fired a $75,000-a-month consulting firm Friday, saying the consultants' scathing report about WVU's health science division and affiliated hospitals was full of errors and misunderstandings.

The nine-page report, by R&V Associates of Pittsburgh, alleged that "serious," "intolerable" and "alarming" problems at WVU hospitals put patients' lives at risk.

The consultants cited the unexpected deaths of two children and an adult. They also criticized WVU for serious shortages of general surgeons, anesthesiologists and heart surgeons that forced hospitals to send patients to facilities in Columbus, Ohio, and Pittsburgh.

WVU said R&V reached false conclusions, in some cases, and the university already was working to fix other problems brought up in the report.

"The report is replete with errors," said Fred Butcher, interim vice president of health sciences. "The process they used was flawed. We're not at all convinced we were on track [with the consultants] to move in the right direction."

Butcher said the university plans to hire another outside consultant that "has experience with academic medical centers."

R&V Associates, which has been paid $321,789, plus expenses, for its work since March, has said the report is accurate.

The consultants issued a statement Friday afternoon, saying a confidentiality agreement with WVU limited what they could say about Butcher's response to the report.

"While we regret that we won't have the opportunity to continue the important work of analyzing, improving, reorganizing and restructuring these programs - it is vital and imperative that such work continue," the consultants said.

WVU selected R&V Associates to evaluate WVU's Health Sciences Center and hospitals in late February. R&V, whose supporters included outgoing WVU President Mike Garrison, state Democratic Party Chairman Nick Casey and WVU neurosurgery department chief Dr. Julian Bailes, had a six-month contract worth $450,000 that was set to expire at the end of August.

Butcher said Friday he was unsure whether the consultants would be paid the contract's full amount.

R&V managing partner Vince Deluzio delivered the nine-page "interim report" to Garrison on May 19.

WVU refused to release the document until Friday, saying there were numerous inaccuracies. Garrison directed Deluzio to revise the report, but Deluzio declined to do so.

Butcher, who issued a point-by-point rebuttal of the consultants' report Friday, said R&V relied too much on unsubstantiated information.

The consultants interviewed 14 of WVU's 360 faculty members before delivering their first report - not a sufficient number to get a fully accurate account of WVU's health sciences division and affiliated hospitals, Butcher said.

"They talked to a very skewed section of the faculty," Butcher said. "Many of the issues were things we were aware of and trying to fix."

R&V's report makes a vague reference to the unexpected deaths of two children "involving pediatrics and anesthesia" at WVU hospitals.

The consultants also mention an adult patient who died after undergoing a cardiac procedure without a heart surgeon standing by as backup. Another patient in a similar situation survived after being flown by helicopter from Morgantown to the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, according to the report.

Advertiser
Report a violation or offensive comment.
[X] Close
to report abuse.
Posted By: weirtonmd (8:09am 06-17-2008)
Report Abuse


I have no connection with Wheeling Hospital. However, I know several patients who have chosen to be treated down there - primarily for prostate cancer. All have reported no problems with their treatment, and one who was there several years previously said things were much better. I looked up the statistics, and most federally tracked indicators (e.g. sentinel events) also seem to have improved over the last five years. The physicians I have talked with seem very happy about the changes, and the one nurse I know is happy to have received the first pay raise in years. Given the objective data, the fact that most who complain are former staff, and the fact that the new administrators had to upgrade many areas that were under performing, it seems that most of the complaints can be classified as "sour grapes."

Posted By: helpisontheway (4:26pm 06-16-2008)
Report Abuse


before anyone casts the first stone, read the report and the rebuttal from WVU...you will realize that the consultant firm must have been eating pop rocks and drinking pepsi when those two sat down to write down all the decite and conspiracy that they uncovered at WVU

I am more worried about the surgeons that they suggested...who really wants a Pittsburgh hospital's cast-offs or lefovers? who knows if they are any good or not but I guess since we have hit rock bottom with CT surgery, it really doesn't matter, does it???

Posted By: hmmmm (3:14pm 06-16-2008)
Report Abuse


So, if you dont like what you hear, you just fire them? I thought they were there to help them even if it means reporting things they dont want (but desperately need) to hear.

Posted By: wvuhstdnt (11:17am 06-16-2008)
Report Abuse


I work at wvuh,if the people of this state knew what really went on there,then they would be scared to death to go there for health care!!Our facility is so understaffed and underpaid,it suprises me that the report wasnt worse,and that the health department allows Ruby Memorial to operate.I have personally witnessed many many things that have directly adversly affected paitent care,things that could be easily fixed by simply hiring more staff and paying the ones they have they have proper wages to keep them.If the public really knew how dirty and mis kept that hospital was,there would be such an outrage that they screaming and protesting would bury the govener himself in dung.

It's easy to follow the top stories with home delivery of The Charleston Gazette.

Click here to order home delivery.

Advertiser
Advertiser