July 15, 2008
Kanawha school board member believes he has votes for drug testing, library lawsuit
Page 2 of 2
Advertiser

Although many county school systems contribute to their county libraries, Kanawha is one of nine counties with special acts spelling out how they will give.

The school board tried to reintroduce the case to the Supreme Court this year, but justices said it was not an appropriate venue at the time.

"I hope the whole board will support the effort to get this resolved in court," Raglin said. "Whatever is the ruling, ultimately of the court, I'm willing to accept."

He said the library deserves public funds, but wants the courts to decide if state lawmakers took the appropriate action.

Board member Jim Crawford will not support a new court case. "I just feel like at some point it's still going to cost the taxpayers to pay it," he said.

Rector said she has weighed the pros and cons of both issues and has sought advice.

On the library, Rector said she wants to explore the board's legal options.

She has favored expanding the employee drug testing policy to include more random testing of teachers, principals, board members, the superintendent and other employees.

Rector said Monday that she wants a "more inclusive" policy that would test teachers and others, but she still is concerned about the cost and legal issues surrounding drug tests.

Thaw said a new draft of the drug testing policy makes it clear that Kanawha County Schools will abide by all state and federal laws concerning random drug testing.

He wants a stronger policy but said the county doesn't need to be the "test case" for random drug testing of public employees.

Crawford, who joined Welch and Becky Jordon in voting down some past drug testing policies, said he'd keep an open mind.

"I'm going to listen," he said.

Reach Davin White at davinwh...@wvgazette.com or 348-1254.

Report a violation or offensive comment.
[X] Close
to report abuse.
Posted By: Pro Educator (2:17pm 07-17-2008)
Report Abuse


Probably the same percentage as other professions. Other occupations have random drug testing, and do just fine.

A momentary lapse in a classroom can have devastating effects (hallucination, violent outburst, sleeping, etc...)

Posted By: SeenItAll (10:14pm 07-16-2008)
Report Abuse


To WVU fan -

Do you want your son or daughter teaching druggies? CASE CLOSED

Posted By: freedom (12:15am 07-16-2008)
Report Abuse


I'm trying not to be absolutist.
If there is some valid reason to suspect a bus driver is abusing drugs, then you can make a persuavive argument for a specified (not random) test. A momentary lapse in judgement could cause injury or death.
I can't really think of any good reason a teacher should be tested. If they aren't performing well there are other steps that can be taken.

Posted By: make up your mind (12:06am 07-16-2008)
Report Abuse


"Posted By: freedom (12:28am 07-15-2008)

How is it that we can preach patriotism, salute the flag, sing the anthem and heap praises on our military who are out there dying for our freedoms, and at the same time be yelling to give up those very same freedoms without a shot being fired. It's sad.
No one should be "randomly" drug tested. It is a farce. If someone is performing poorly the reason should be looked into. Otherwise, we are innocent until proven guilty"

"Posted By: freedom
I don't think anyone should have to do this unless you are in a position where safety and security is paramount (such as a bus driver)..."

So which is it "freedom"? No one should be tested...or just those evil bus drivers? Teachers are also in a position where safety and security are paramount.

Advertisement - Your ad here
Advertisement - Your ad here
ROUTE 21 DINER
Route 21 Diner (formerly Shotguns) is a family owned and run country restaurant. We're open for ...
Advertisement - Your ad here