News
July 29, 2008
Plant to produce coal-gas
Questions remain about controlling CONSOL plant's greenhouse emissions

CHARLESTON, W.Va. - Gov. Joe Manchin on Monday praised CONSOL Energy's plans to build what he called "the nation's first modern coal-to-liquids plant" near one of its Northern Panhandle mines.

But plans for controlling the plant's greenhouse emissions are still being studied, officials said.

And many energy experts believe liquid coal, even with carbon dioxide capture and storage, will add to the global warming problem.

"Even under the best conditions - let's say they could capture all of their carbon emissions - it would still exceed the emissions of today's gasoline," said Patricia Monahan, deputy director for clean vehicles at the Union of Concerned Scientists.

Monahan's group is among the many scientific and environmental groups that are questioning the continued push for coal-to-liquids facilities by the mining industry and coal-state politicians.

But in West Virginia, liquid coal is at the heart of Manchin's new state energy policy.

The policy, approved in December, calls for a series of coal-to-liquid plants around the state. The plan says little about climate change, and state Energy Director Jeff Herholdt has compared talking about greenhouse emissions in an energy plan to "talking about apples and oranges."

On Monday, Manchin traveled to Benwood to join local officials and developers in announcing the $800 million CONSOL coal-to-liquids plant.

"Technological solutions like this plant at Benwood will lead to more environmentally friendly ways to use our coal and hold the key to America's energy security," Manchin said in a statement.

CONSOL said the project would be a joint venture with Houston-based Synthesis Energy Systems Inc., through a new firm called Appalachian Fuel LLC.

The plant, to be built in an industrial park south of Wheeling, will convert coal to gas using a Synthesis proprietary technology called U-Gas. It is expected that this gas will be used to produce methanol for the chemical industry. The project is also expected "to be capable" of converting methanol production to about 100 million gallons a year of 87-octane gasoline, developers said.

CONSOL would provide about 1 million tons a year of coal and several hundred thousand tons a year of fine coal waste from its nearby Shoemaker Mine, officials said. Developers hope to have the plant up and running by early 2012.

"This project has the potential to transform West Virginia from a major coal producing state to a national energy center as well," said J. Brett Harvey, president of CONSOL.

Advertiser
Report a violation or offensive comment.
[X] Close
to report abuse.
Posted By: hollergirl (2:02pm 07-31-2008)
Report Abuse


We cannot drill and blast our way out of this energy crisis. Wake up!
With filthy liquid coal we are only switching to who we are paying---the coal company or the oil company. With solar power electric cars we can tell them all where to put their fuel. We won't need to buy their fuel.
Newsflash...we use gas and diesel to dig the coal to make the gas to dig the coal and then use coal electricity to make the gas--it is chasing our tails---over and over again. Then when coal is almost gone in 20 years ---we are slaves to them again. Get your knuckles off the ground---think!

Posted By: wvwaterfall (10:27am 07-31-2008)
Report Abuse


The argument that we are no longer warming is a classic case of manipulating data. 1998 was by far the warmest year on record due to a combination of global warming and an exceptional El Nino. So contrarians point to cooler years since then as "proof" that global warming is a hoax. Yet every year this century has been in the top ten hottest years on record, stretching back over 150 years.

Human activities have increased atmospheric CO2 concentrations to the highest levels in human history. To think that would have no effect defies both logic and the results of the same scientific method that brought us so many technological advances over the last century including, among other things, the ability to convert coal to liquid fuel and to debate its worth in a forum like this.

The handful of skeptics with some sort of scientific credentials who keep getting more coverage than they deserve have resorted to public statements because they can't survive the legitimate scientific process.

Posted By: C (10:40am 07-30-2008)
Report Abuse


Great article! WV needs to stop investing in outdated technology if we want to be economically competitive. The carbon capture and sequestration these people all promise to use is a fine idea, though it needs more research--we should start by using it with power plants, then push for production of electric cars. Then they'd really be clean, instead of releasing about the same amount of greenhouse gas as oil, and we would be weaning ourselves from foreign oil. Even if you don't believe in global warming, electric cars would be cheaper, more efficient, and cleaner.

Posted By: WVState (10:38am 07-30-2008)
Report Abuse


But this does nothing for actually weaning us off oil. It's an oil replacement, and a small one at that, and an inadequate one besides, just like ethanol from corn. This will supplement and/or replace a small portion of our oil imports. How about some new technology to actually replace burning oil to get from here to there?

It's easy to follow the top stories with home delivery of The Charleston Gazette.

Click here to order home delivery.

Advertiser
Advertiser