News
September 25, 2008
Case-by-case bond best, court candidates agree
Advertisement - Your ad here

CHARLESTON, W.Va. - Candidates for Kanawha County Magistrate discussed the variables that go into determining the proper bond amount for criminal defendants Wednesday during a meeting with Gazette editors.

Asked about the $5,000 bond with a 10 percent cash option that he set Tuesday for Thomas and Ruby Freeman, a Charleston couple accused of neglecting their five daughters, Democratic incumbent Tim Halloran said that sometimes even a relatively low dollar figure is enough to keep defendants incarcerated if they don't have the means to post bond.

"What I did was put them in jail that night, and those children are in the custody of the state," he said. "You can't punish people with bond. We're not there to find people guilty on the spot."

While the nine other sitting magistrates and challenger Paris Workman declined to comment specifically on the case, most agreed that bond should be determined on a case-by-case basis.

"I take the seriousness of the crime [into consideration]. If it's drugs or any violent crime, I hammer [defendants]," said Chief Kanawha Magistrate Joe Shelton.

"People don't realize how bad drugs are in this valley," the Democrat continued. "I've set bond at $50,000 with a 10 percent option, and the guy reaches into his pocket and pulls out $5,000 cash."

Ward Harshbarger, a Democrat from Dunbar who is seeking his eighth term on the bench, said it's important not to get caught up in public opinion when dealing with allegations of particularly heinous crimes.

"We don't want a fascist society," he said. "We want people to come to trial. We want to keep people from harming other people. We want to keep people from committing other crimes."

Democratic incumbent Traci Carper-Strickland, who served as a magistrate from 2000 to 2004 and was reappointed last year after taking time off to spend with her young children, said that in many cases, magistrates have to base their decisions on the bare-bones allegations in a criminal complaint. More evidence, sometimes in the defendant's favor, comes out later during hearings, she said.

"We go by the merits of the complaint and set the bonds accordingly," she said.

Pete Lopez, a Democrat who is seeking his fourth term, agreed, saying sometimes police officers include only enough detail in criminal complaints to get probable cause.

"If it comes to where the complaint is not very explanatory, then I'll ask them," he said.

Magistrate Marva Crouch, a Democrat seeking her second term, said rising jail costs and crowded conditions mean that incarceration should be used only when appropriate.

"If [defendants] have nothing in the computer and it's not a violent crime, there's no need to send them to South Central [Regional Jail]," she said. "There are times when South Central is not the right place for somebody."

Longtime Republican incumbent Carol Fouty said she also looks for ties to Kanawha County before making up her mind.

Advertisement - Your ad here
Report a violation or offensive comment.
[X] Close
to report abuse.
Posted By: Anonymous (12:27am 09-26-2008)
Report Abuse


What we need is someone who actually has a LEGAL EDUCATION. I don't think it is very prudent that we allow non-lawyers, untrained in the law, to make decisions that can affect the rest of someone's life. It takes 7 years of higher education to prosecute or defend a criminal, but nothing but a high school diploma or equivalency to decide complex legal issues and make determinations that can put someone in jail, take their driver's license, or put them on a sex offender registry.
For lawyers practicing before magistrates, trying to present a legitimate legal argument is like reading Shakespeare to a newborn. They just don't have the ability to "get it".

It's easy to follow the top stories with home delivery of The Charleston Gazette.

Click here to order home delivery.

Advertisement - Your ad here