February 1, 2009
Doctor experimented on patients, suit alleges
Advertiser

A whistleblower complaint accuses former osteopathic surgeon Dr. John A. King of experimenting on 26 of his patients.

The federal complaint says King used medical devices in ways that hadn't been approved by the FDA and received illegal kickbacks for doing it.

"King and David McNair [King's physician assistant] were conducting clinical research and human patient experimentation when they performed the anterior lumbar inter-body fusions" on eight patients, the "qui tam," or whistleblower, complaint states.

"King and McNair took studies that failed in laboratory animals, and then, without any reasonable basis to conclude that they would be successful, began to experiment on humans," the complaint says.

King generated 124 medical malpractice lawsuits during his short tenure at Putnam General Hospital between November 2002 and June 2003.

He's lost his medical license in numerous states, including West Virginia. Putnam General's former owner, Hospital Corporation of America, has paid out approximately $100 million to settle King-generated lawsuits.

These new charges against King are contained in a previously sealed whistleblower complaint filed against EBI Inc. on May 12, 2006, in federal court in Charleston.

Last month, U.S. District Judge John Copenhaver unsealed the complaint, after giving the Department of Justice the required opportunity to investigate its allegations. The results of that investigation have not been made public.

The whistleblower complaint was filed by eight former King patients who were covered by federally-funded health insurance programs, such as Medicare.

They are seeking to recover money for the federal government. Under the federal False Claims Act, they would be entitled to one-quarter of the money recovered.

Along with King and McNair, the complaint targets two companies:

  • Wright Medical Technology Inc. based in Arlington, Tenn., made Allomatrix, a bone fusion material that failed to work properly during two experimental studies performed on rats and rabbits. A third study, using pig-tailed macaques, rare primates native to Southeast Asia, showed "questionable" benefits.
  • EBI Inc., a subsidiary of Biomet Inc. in Parsippany, N.J., made spine stimulating devices King used during his surgeries. EBI allegedly paid King a bonus each time he inserted one of their "Ionic Spacers" into a patient's spine.
  • The ionic spacer had never been successfully used in an animal or human study to replace a diseased or damaged vertebral disk, according to the complaint.

    Last month, Copenhaver also ordered the previously sealed complaint to be served on EBI. The company has not filed a response.

    EBI Inc. and Wright Medical officials did not return telephone calls Friday.

    No consent, no review

    According to the complaint, King and McNair undertook deliberate, well-planned experiments on these patients.

    For example, they allegedly made sure half the patients were male and half female. They implanted 12 patients with one type of device, and 14 patients with another.

    Despite this, patients say they were never informed they would receive an experimental device.

    "If any patients were to have been participants by design in an experimental protocol such as that conducted by King and McNair, appropriate informed consents would have to have been obtained from the patients," the complaint states.

    There is no evidence patients were asked to sign a consent form.

    "Additionally, institutional review board approval would have had to have been granted by the hospital where the clinical study was undertaken" and all procedures "approved by the research committee of the medical center."

    Those procedures were never followed at Putnam General.

    EBI was fully aware of what King was doing at that time, the qui tam complaint alleges.

    In a July 1, 2004 letter, John M. Blumers, EBI's general counsel and vice president, "acknowledged that King and McNair were using the [ionic spacer] devices for purposes that were never approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration," the complaint states.

    Blumers also acknowledged King and McNair were using Wright Medical's Allomatrix as a "substitute" for federally approved bone-graft materials. 

    Greg Ray, an EBI sales representative, was actually in the operating room at Putnam General Hospital at least 10 times when King performed surgeries between Jan. 27 and May 28, 2003, according to patient records.

    In 2005, Ray purchased Banana Joe's, a downtown nightclub, according to newspaper articles. Within months, the nightclub was stripped of its liquor license after numerous fights there.

    Kickbacks

    EBI regularly gave physicians, such as King, kickbacks for using its unapproved ionic spacers, the complaint states.

    The EBI sales department allegedly administered these kickbacks.

    Report a violation or offensive comment.
    [X] Close
    to report abuse.
    Posted By: 070707 (9:13am 02-02-2009)
    Report Abuse


    Way2Old - are you suggesting that if it didn't cause harm to the patient it is ok that he used the device without their consent? What doctor does a procedure on a patient and doesn't tell them what they are going to use on them or leave inside of them?

    What about the other people, nurses, tech, etc. in the surgeries? Were the nurses not smart enough to know what was going on?

    What kind of companies encourage doctors to use bad equipment on patients? They are murderers in my eyes. Even if someone didn't die from the use of it, their lives as they knew it are gone. What a sick world.

    Posted By: whistlingdixie (10:50pm 02-01-2009)
    Report Abuse


    Think of the misery, pain, suffering, and mental anguish this "doctor" caused his patients. The company, who allowed unethical testing of their products, should not be allowed to stay in business, because they are just as guilty as Dr. King for allowing such cruelty in their product testing.

    Posted By: ADVOCATE (9:30pm 02-01-2009)
    Report Abuse


    Whether materials used on these patients have worked or not who knows the short/longterm affect these materials can have on these people! Will they trust someone else to remove these materials if necessary? How many Hospitals around the country have agreed to order such materials from these two companies? How will this be found out? This is an Out-RAGE! Shame on the hospital Staff and Administration Who CHOOSE To KEEP QUIET while they WALKED AWAY instead of TALKING to Those People and REPORTING THIS INFORMATION TO THE Appropiate AUTHORITIES! SHAME,SHAME,SHAME ON ALL OF YOU! Everyone that walked away would FEEL as STRONGLY as I do in this Matter if it had been YOU or YOUR Loved Ones, unfortunately,YOUR HEARTS were Focused only on Yourselves,not others you could have HELPED! King & McNair need to be FOUND SOON as they could be INCOGNITO PRACTICING IN ANOTHER HOSPITAL DOING THE SAME THING! It's FRIGHTENING to go to hospitals anymore because many medical pro's care about money
    not life!

    Posted By: curiousme (9:07pm 02-01-2009)
    Report Abuse


    I agree with ya, keepingup.

    Advertisement - Your ad here
    Advertisement - Your ad here
    ROUTE 21 DINER
    Route 21 Diner (formerly Shotguns) is a family owned and run country restaurant. We're open for ...
    Deal of the Day - ROUTE 21 DINER
    10% off delivery orders
    Advertisement - Your ad here