March 11, 2009
Forest Service ignored concerns about drilling
Advertiser

CHARLESTON, W.Va. - A private gas drilling and pipeline project in the Fernow Experimental Forest threatened an underground cave system that shelters endangered bats, created toxic runoff and damaged long-term forest ecology, according to a report from the group Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility.

U.S. Forest Service officials approved the project, despite grave concerns expressed by the agency's staff scientists about impacts on the Fernow, according to documents released by PEER.

The Fernow, located in the Monongahela National Forest near Parsons, is used for research on growing trees and on better ways of timbering.

PEER filed a complaint Tuesday with the inspector general of the Department of Agriculture, which oversees the Forest Service, over the Fernow incident.

"The Monongahela offers a textbook example of how drilling should not be done on a national forest," said PEER executive director Jeff Ruch. "Unless the inspector general intervenes, we will see more train wrecks like what occurred on the Monongahela National Forest when the price of natural gas begins to rise again."

According to documents released by PEER, Berry Energy in 2007 filed a permit to drill on the Fernow in a location referred to as B-800.

Forest Service experts were concerned that the project would harm critical cave habitat of the endangered Indiana bat. But Forest Service managers did not allow for formal consultation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service on the issue, according to the PEER documents.

Scientists in the Forest Service were also concerned about potential damage from toxic materials in the "pit fluids" created by the gas drilling.

Forest Service staffers - all Ph.D. scientists - complained about these issues to Michael Rains, director of the agency's Northern Research Station, which oversees the Fernow.

The three scientists - Mary Beth Adams, W. Mark Ford and Thomas M. Schuler - warned that approving the drilling would violate several sections of the federal Endangered Species Act.

Report a violation or offensive comment.
[X] Close
to report abuse.
Posted By: gmonk (7:52pm 03-21-2009)
Report Abuse


I appreciated reading this article, especially since it added information to my own research about the landspraying event at Fernow Experimental Forest.

I have a post on our blog about the state's lack of chloride load in its landspraying program (http://sootypaws.livejournal.com/8101.html). Berry Energy's Discharge Monitoring Report, filed with the Office of Oil and Gas, states that 100,000 gallons of liquid waste with a chloride level of 6,210 mg/l was landsprayed on 2 acres of the Forest. That was beyond any reasonable load that I'm familiar with (the post mentions Oklahoma's load of 400 pounds an acre; Wisconsin has a limit of 250 pounds an acre chlorides for landspreading food waste and Saskatchewan has a limit of 400 kg/ha, 356 pounds an acre, for landspraying drill waste).

I'm not entirely sure that the overload of chlorides was the only factor in liquid drilling waste killing trees at Fernow, but it was certainly a major cause.

Thanks! George Monk

Advertisement - Your ad here
Advertisement - Your ad here
 PAT JACOBS LAW OFFICE
Attorney Pat Jacobs has over 30 years experience successfully representing injured and disabled i...
Advertisement - Your ad here