June 16, 2009
Byrd staff to examine mountaintop removal, flooding
Gazette file photo
Sen. Robert C. Byrd, D-W.Va., announced Tuesday that several of his Charleston and Washington, D.C., staff members are on a three-day fact-finding tour, looking at mountaintop-removal mines and coal communities in Southern West Virginia.
Advertiser

CHARLESTON, W.Va. -- Sen. Robert C. Byrd, D-W.Va., announced Tuesday that several of his Charleston and Washington, D.C., staff members are on a three-day fact-finding tour, looking at mountaintop-removal mines and coal communities in Southern West Virginia.

Staff members plan to talk with representatives from the coal industry, the environmental community and local concerned citizens.

"During their visit, they are also expected to evaluate the ongoing flood recovery efforts, and discuss concerns expressed to my office about the impact of mountaintop mining and the severity of damage from the recent floods," Byrd said.

"With the recent announcement from the Obama administration that it is planning to increase federal oversight of the mining operations, I believe it is imperative for my staff and me to hear from all interested parties in West Virginia as we move forward on this debate."

Bill Raney, president of the West Virginia Coal Association, said on Tuesday, "It is absolutely great they are coming down to see what modern mining operations look like. They can visit mines that are in compliance with all the laws that have matured over the past 30 years" since the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act was passed in 1977.

"It is important they look at these operations, since the [Obama] administration seems to be trying to undo all the progress that has been made over the past three decades."

Raney said all types of mining have environmental impacts. "Any place you have mining, you will have valley fills.

"But the economic impact is absolutely huge, when you think of the enormous revenues that come to the state because of mining. Today, 20,000 people work directly for the industry, while another 40,000 to 50,000 jobs depend on the industry."

Today, surface mines produce 42 percent of all West Virginia coal.

"What is going on in Washington, with this administration's cap-and-trade legislation, will end up costing everyone in West Virginia more money. It seems really unnecessary," Raney said.

Report a violation or offensive comment.
[X] Close
to report abuse.
Posted By: FYI25203 (10:39am 06-19-2009)
Report Abuse


The only problem for those of you who say MTR should be banned and underground mining should be increased is that underground mining is as destructive as MTR mining. And that doesn't take into consideration how unsafe it is.

The proof is in history. Take a look at every mine disaster in our history. If you do some research, you'll find all occurred or resulted from underground mining.

Posted By: Nanette (4:37pm 06-18-2009)
Report Abuse


How did America produce electricity before surface mining? That's right they produced all the electricity that this nation ever needed without MTR. The fact is that only a small amount of our electricity is produced by MTR. If we did away with MTR mined coal tomorrow we would still have power flowing into our homes and businesses. This business of the pro coal crowd saying that if we are against MTR to turn out our lights just shows how ignorant they are.

I have read comments about this subject that said coal that is mined by the underground method is only met coal. What an absurdity! Wake up people and stop being spoon fed the propaganda of the coal industry! Underground coal has been used for many years to produce electricty, long before the horrendous MTR practice began. Some of us are old enough to know better, and we had family members who worked those underground mines who knew where the coal that they mined went. Most of it went to power companies

Posted By: sodbuster (10:08am 06-18-2009)
Report Abuse


Well I know you guys are probably sincere in your doom and gloom predictions.

But fact is that mtr derived coal is not even close to being the big source of energy for electric power.

The sky will not fall if this abominable practice is outlawed.

There is plenty of recoverable coal that can be mined with less destructive means.

Could it be the coal cabal understands this and that is why they always throw out this argument that with no coal it will be bad.

I suppose somebody, somewhere, has proposed a total ban on all coal mining, but mostly it is just used as a strawman argument.

Posted By: CAPTAINJOE (9:03am 06-18-2009)
Report Abuse


As long as there is a profit to be made on any resource, it will be extracted. That being said, The EPA should dictate valley fills, resoiling, replanting and minimizing pollution sources as our DEP is on record that they could care less. Testing of ground water should be accomplished mmonthly and at the first sign of contamination "all mining operations stopped". This along with other safeguards might make the coal companies operate on the up and up.
Until we have something to take the place of coal, reguardless of what that is, discontinuing coal mining, is NOT an option. So for all you anti-coal people, you better start advocating nuclear enegry or ??? or you are in store for more of the same.

Advertisement - Your ad here
Advertisement - Your ad here
Advertisement - Your ad here