August 10, 2010
Legislators want stimulus answers
Advertiser

CHARLESTON, W.Va. -- As Gov. Joe Manchin runs for the U.S. Senate, legislators are escalating their efforts to find out how his administration plans to spend federal stimulus dollars.

"It has become a time-sensitive thing," House of Delegates Majority Leader Brent Boggs said Tuesday. "Should the governor move on to other endeavors, we need that information. It would be very difficult for the person who's acting governor to come in and find all the necessary information."

Since early 2009, the Obama administration has awarded $2.3 billion in stimulus money to West Virginia. The Manchin administration is responsible for spending $1.05 billion of it.

Last week, Manchin officials said that although they have spent only 40 percent of the dollars under their control, they have obligated 97 percent.

"Obligated" means the work is under contract, Manchin policy chief Jim Pitrolo said.

"Then we should be able to get a list of those contracts," Nancy Guthrie, chairwoman of the House stimulus committee, said Tuesday. "We've been asking for that information since May, but they haven't given it to us.

"There's no reason for this to be cloaked in secrecy," she said. "They're using the money for many fine projects, from all I can tell. But it's gotten beyond the point where 'trust us' is a sufficient answer."

If a state does not spend its allocation by the federal deadlines, the state loses the money, she said. Deadlines begin this fall and stretch into 2015, depending on the program.

The administration has not spent more than $600 million, Guthrie noted. "If they have those dollars obligated, we need that information. Obligated to whom? How much? Which counties?"

Today, the legislative leadership will ask Jim Pitrolo, Manchin's policy chief, to provide details, Boggs said. Pitrolo will attend the meeting of the Joint Committee on Government and Finance, which includes the House Speaker, Senate President, and heads of major committees.

Legislators in other states received that information months ago, Michael Bird, federal affairs counsel for the National Conference of State Legislatures, said Tuesday.

"In states I know about, where the legislature is really active, that information is out there for everybody to see," Bird said. "There's no benefit to hiding this stuff."

By June, only one other state -- Alaska -- had spent its stimulus dollars more slowly than West Virginia had, according to a report released last week by Federal Funds Information for States in Washington, D.C.

Bird said slowness is not necessarily a problem if a state has solid plans for its unspent dollars. Some projects -- like West Virginia's statewide broadband project -- require extensive planning, he said. "So it depends on the program deadlines and the plans for spending the money."

Many West Virginia projects require considerable preparation: sewer, water and highways projects and others. If the contracts are in order, Bird said, West Virginia may be in good position. "They have salted it away, which may mean they are sitting in good position to withstand continued economic downturns."

Article Preview

This article is available only to our premium digital content subscribers.

Legislators want stimulus answers

CHARLESTON, W.Va. -- As Gov. Joe Manchin runs for the U.S. Senate, legislators are escalating their efforts to find out how his administration plans to spend federal stimulus dollars.

"It has become a time-sensitive thing," House of Delegates Majority Leader Brent Boggs said Tuesday. "Should the governor move on to other endeavors, we need that information. It would be very difficult for the person who's acting governor to come in and find all the necessary information."

Since early 2009, the Obama administration has awarded $2.3 billion in stimulus money to West Virginia. The Manchin administration is responsible for spending $1.05 billion of it.

Last week, Manchin officials said that although they have spent only 40 percent of the dollars under their control, they have obligated 97 percent.

"Obligated" means the work is under contract, Manchin policy chief Jim Pitrolo said.

"Then we should be able to get a list of those contracts," Nancy Guthrie, chairwoman of the House stimulus committee, said Tuesday. "We've been asking for that information since May, but they haven't given it to us.

"There's no reason for this to be cloaked in secrecy," she said. "They're using the money for many fine projects, from all I can tell. But it's gotten beyond the point where 'trust us' is a sufficient answer."

If a state does not spend its allocation by the federal deadlines, the state loses the money, she said. Deadlines begin this fall and stretch into 2015, depending on the program.

The administration has not spent more than $600 million, Guthrie noted. "If they have those dollars obligated, we need that information. Obligated to whom? How much? Which counties?"

Today, the legislative leadership will ask Jim Pitrolo, Manchin's policy chief, to provide details, Boggs said. Pitrolo will attend the meeting of the Joint Committee on Government and Finance, which includes the House Speaker, Senate President, and heads of major committees.

Legislators in other states received that information months ago, Michael Bird, federal affairs counsel for the National Conference of State Legislatures, said Tuesday.

"In states I know about, where the legislature is really active, that information is out there for everybody to see," Bird said. "There's no benefit to hiding this stuff."

By June, only one other state -- Alaska -- had spent its stimulus dollars more slowly than West Virginia had, according to a report released last week by Federal Funds Information for States in Washington, D.C.

Bird said slowness is not necessarily a problem if a state has solid plans for its unspent dollars. Some projects -- like West Virginia's statewide broadband project -- require extensive planning, he said. "So it depends on the program deadlines and the plans for spending the money."

Many West Virginia projects require considerable preparation: sewer, water and highways projects and others. If the contracts are in order, Bird said, West Virginia may be in good position. "They have salted it away, which may mean they are sitting in good position to withstand continued economic downturns."

1 Day Online Only
$0.99
Click here to purchase a one day subscription.
1 Month Online Only
$9.99
Click here to sign up for a one month subscription.
1 Month Online + Print Delivery
$31.99
Click here to sign up for our Premium subscription package.
Advertisement - Your ad here
Get Daily Headlines by E-Mail
Sign up for the latest news delivered to your inbox each morning.
Advertisement - Your ad here
Advertisement - Your ad here
Advertisement - Your ad here