January 16, 2012
Congressional redistricting plan introduced produces grumbling
Advertiser

CHARLESTON, W.Va. -- The first of at least three proposals for congressional redistricting was introduced in the state Senate on Monday -- prompting considerable consternation among some senators.

The proposal (SB199), sponsored by Senate Majority Leader John Unger, D-Berkeley, and others, goes to the Senate Select Committee on Redistricting, which is chaired by Unger.

However, Unger said Senate President Jeff Kessler, D-Marshall, had asked that the committee not take up the bill immediately.

"The president has asked me to hold off until a later date," Unger said. "We want to make sure the public has time to look at it, and other plans that may be presented."

Unger's plan would link the Northern and Eastern Panhandles via north-central West Virginia. Some Senate Democrats complained Monday that the addition of the Eastern Panhandle to the 1st Congressional District would create a "safe" district for Republican U.S. Rep. David McKinley.

The 3rd District, a Democratic stronghold in Southern West Virginia, would be relatively unchanged in Unger's plan, except for the addition of most of Randolph County.

When a federal appeals court threw out the state's original attempt at congressional redistricting last month, Unger said, the judges said the population in the three congressional districts wasn't equal enough, and the districts weren't compact enough.

Unger said his proposal answers those issues. He noted that in his proposed 2nd District, a members of Congress could drive up Interstate 79 from Kanawha County to Harrison County, then over to Wood County on U.S. 50, and back to Kanawha County on Interstate 77.

"You could probably cover the entire district and still be home for dinner," Unger said.

He said that if the Legislature is going to act, it needs to do so quickly, or risk having a redistricting plan imposed by the federal court. He said he believes it's unlikely that the U.S. Supreme Court will issue a stay on the lower court order.

"The state's whole defense is, we don't have time to do it, and that's false," he said of the motion for a stay.

Recommended Stories

Copyright 2012 The Charleston Gazette. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Popular Videos
The Gazette now offers Facebook Comments on its stories. You must be logged into your Facebook account to add comments. If you do not want your comment to post to your personal page, uncheck the box below the comment. Comments deemed offensive by the moderators will be removed, and commenters who persist may be banned from commenting on the site.
Advertisement - Your ad here
Get Daily Headlines by E-Mail
Sign up for the latest news delivered to your inbox each morning.
Advertisement - Your ad here
News Videos
Advertisement - Your ad here
Advertisement - Your ad here