May 31, 2012
Alpha cited for not evacuating mine when belt burned
Page 2 of 2
Advertiser

Shortly after 8 a.m. on May 18, MSHA inspectors arrived at the mine near Pineville, expecting to continue work on a regular, quarterly inspection of the underground operation.

Instead, "it was determined that management was attempting to locate the source of thick smoke that miners had encountered" in a tunnel just outside a working section of the mine," inspectors reported. MSHA ordered the mine evacuated, except for a foreman whose job it was to find the source of the smoke, and cited the company for not evacuating the operation itself.

No one was injured in the incident, but MSHA inspectors wrote in an order that, "The operator has engaged in aggravated conduct constituting more than ordinary negligence because thick smoke was verified, the source of the smoke was not known, miners were underground and the extent of the source of the smoke could not be determined to allow miners to remain underground safely."

MSHA officials said the smoke was traced to what they have called a "burned belt" that is still under investigation. Alpha said in its SEC filing that,

"A slipping conveyor belt was promptly identified as the source [of the smoke] and repaired." Alpha added that, "No fire was discovered, and all air reading indicated that no fire or combustion had occurred in the mine."

MSHA inspectors, though, issued a dozen enforcement orders and citations found at Road Fork 51, including:

 

  • Three serious enforcement orders that cited accumulations of explosive coal dust around and under at least two different conveyor belts in the mine. Dust measured 16 to 18 inches high, "were obvious, extensive for the length of the conveyor, and should have been observed, reported and corrected promptly."
  •  

    Under an agreement that avoided corporate criminal charges from Upper Big Branch, Alpha was required to have implemented a plan to ensure that each of its underground mines "has the personnel and resources necessary to meet all legal requirements relating to incombustible material and to prevent accumulations of coal dust and loose coal."

     

  • Four enforcement orders that alleged inoperable carbon monoxide detectors and fire suppression systems, and that mine management had not been properly inspecting those units to ensure they were in working order.
  •  

     

  • Separate enforcement orders that alleged a conveyor belt was not equipped with working belt-slippage switch to reduce friction and prevent fires, and alleged that company did not conduct an adequate safety examination that would have identified the problem.
  •  

     

  • An enforcement order that alleged obvious mine roof and wall hazards identified by a mine foreman were not corrected in a timely fashion.
  •  

    "I'm disturbed that when we got to the mine and they knew that they had smoke that we had to order the operator to remove the people from the mine," Stricklin said Thursday. "When I looked at the conditions that we found, it disturbed me even more."

    Reach Ken Ward Jr. at kw...@wvgazette.com or 304-348-1702.

    Recommended Stories

    Copyright 2012 The Charleston Gazette. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
    Popular Videos
    The Gazette now offers Facebook Comments on its stories. You must be logged into your Facebook account to add comments. If you do not want your comment to post to your personal page, uncheck the box below the comment. Comments deemed offensive by the moderators will be removed, and commenters who persist may be banned from commenting on the site.
    Advertisement - Your ad here
    Get Daily Headlines by E-Mail
    Sign up for the latest news delivered to your inbox each morning.
    Advertisement - Your ad here
    News Videos
    Advertisement - Your ad here
    Advertisement - Your ad here