PITTSBURGH -- When Donald Yost tried to refinance his home about 30 miles north of Pittsburgh in January, he met a roadblock. It wasn't his credit score -- he had a solid rating -- or the appraisal he'd paid almost $500 for -- that was good, too.
Instead, it was the lease he has that allows a company to drill for gas about a mile underneath his property, similar to leases that many of his neighbors have.
Yost said that in the middle of the application process ESB Bank told him the gas lease was too prohibitive. So he went to the drilling company, Rex Energy, which agreed to subordinate their claims to the property -- in other words, to put the bank's interest first.
"They were actually very good,'' Yost said of Rex.
But Yost said a bank representative then told him that no loans would be given to anyone with a gas-drilling lease. And that's what upsets Yost the most, he said: that the bank didn't tell him upfront that homes with leases didn't qualify. He said it also declined to refund what he'd paid for his appraisal.
Eventually, Yost did get his home refinanced with another bank -- after he paid for a second appraisal. ESB spokesman Daniel Schwartz said the bank has no comment.
Financial experts say situations like Yost's are rare, and that properties with leases are routinely financed. But banks are taking a new look at how to assess both the positive and negative impacts of the Marcellus Shale boom, which has brought drilling rigs to some communities that never had them before.
The Marcellus Shale is a gas-rich formation of rock thousands of feet below large parts of Pennsylvania, New York, West Virginia and other states. Advances in drilling technology made the shale accessible, which led to a boom in production, jobs and profits, and a drop in natural gas prices for consumers. But there are also concerns about pollution and impacts to roads and other public services.