July 2, 2000
SNUFFED OUT
Lawmakers shy away from tobacco tax laws
Advertiser

Lynn Byus started dipping snuff on a dare.

 

 

Byus, 39, now works for the West Virginia Chapter of the American

 

Cancer Society. She giggled a

little when she told about how she became

 

addicted to smokeless tobacco as a 12-year-old. Was

she

 

embarrassed about her tobacco habit?

 

 

"Now, yes, I'm embarrassed by it," she said, "but then, no. We didn't

 

know any better."

 

 

Byus wanted to play basketball with the boys, but they wouldn't let

 

her. During the county

fair, she was standing in line to go on the

 

Tilt-a-Whirl ride. She begged the boys again to let

her on the team.

 

 

All right, one boy told her, you can play, but only if you can take a

 

dip of snuff and not get

sick.

 

 

"It burnt really bad, but I wouldn't let anybody know," she

  • aid.
  • "I

     

    blamed getting sick on the

    ride."

     

     

    Peer pressure may have got her hooked, Byus said, but the cheapness of

     

  • nuff kept her coming

    back. She wants state lawmakers to

  •  

    tax smokeless tobacco as a way to keep kids from starting

     

    to

    chew.

     

     

    "If it costs more, more kids will quit," she

  • aid.
  •  

     

    Most West Virginians agree with Byus that smokeless tobacco

     

  • eeds to be taxed. A 1998 poll,

    done by the Coalition for a

  •  

    Tobacco-Free West Virginia, showed 83 percent want to tax

     

  • nuff and

    chewing tobacco. West Virginia is one of only nine

  •  

  • tates that do not tax smokeless tobacco.
  •  

     

    Not some evil thing

     

     

    Earlier this year, it looked like Byus and others like her would get

     

    their way. A tax on

    smokeless tobacco had the support of

     

    Gov. Cecil Underwood; House Speaker Robert Kiss,

    D-Raleigh; veterans;

     

    health groups; and a majority of delegates in the House.

     

     

    But opposition from members of the Senate leadership kept the issue

     

    from even coming up for a

    vote. The bill died in the Senate Finance

     

    Committee. Sen. Oshel Craigo, D-Putnam, is chairman

    of the committee.

     

     

    That committee had six of the top 10 recipients of tobacco

     

    contributions in 1998, according to

    a Sunday Gazette-Mail analysis of

     

    the People's Election Reform Coalition (PERC) campaign

    finance

     

    database.

     

     

    Three groups that publicly opposed the smokeless tobacco

     

    tax - tobacco lobbyists, tobacco

    political action

     

    committees, and the West Virginia Wholesalers Association - gave a total

     

    of

    $15,550 in 1998 to seven members of the Senate Finance Committee.

     

     

    They gave $5,500 to Craigo's 1998 campaign, more than any other member

     

    of the Legislature. In

    addition, Craigo owns part interest in a service

     

  • tation in Nitro that sells tobacco products.

    He said neither

  •  

    his personal or campaign finances affected his decision-making.

     

     

    "It's not an issue with me. I'm in the retail business, and I

     

    understand their concerns," he

  • aid.
  •  

     

    Craigo said he opposed the tax on smokeless tobacco

     

    because of two promises: one to tobacco

    farmers in his district

     

  • ot to raise tobacco taxes, the other to voters statewide not to
  •  

    raise

    any taxes. He also helped put an additional $800,000 into

     

    anti-tobacco advertising.

     

     

    "This is not some evil thing you guys would like to conjure up," Craigo

     

  • aid.
  •  

     

    Somebody's got to look out for you

     

     

    For whatever reason, Craigo and other members of the Senate leadership

     

    are responsible for the

    death of the tobaccotax, said

     

    Sara Crickenberger, executive director of the American Lung

    Association

     

    of West Virginia. All she wanted from them was one vote of the whole

     

    Senate.

     

     

    "If we could get leadership to give us a floor vote, we knew we'd stand

     

    a chance," she

  • aid.
  •  

     

    For four years, she had tried to convince lawmakers that the

     

    best way to get young people off

    smokeless tobacco was to raise

     

    its price. For three years, the bill went nowhere.

     

     

    But in 2000, several things changed. A group of anti-tobacco

     

    organizations combined their

    resources and hired Tom Susman, a former

     

    legislator and veteran lobbyist.

     

     

    "Somebody's got to be looking out for you," Crickenberger

  • aid.
  •  

     

    The national tobacco settlement also exposed a different side of

     

    the tobacco industry. When

    tobacco executives lined up in

     

    front of a congressional committee and said that tobacco was

     

    not

    addictive, they lost all their credibility, she

  • aid.
  •  

     

    Finally, the tax gained some powerful allies when Delegate Larry

     

    Linch, D-Harrison, added an

    amendment that would have used the

     

    tax to fund nursing homes for veterans.

     

     

    Even if the bill passed the House, Crickenberger knew it would probably

     

    die later. Senate

    President Earl Ray Tomblin, D-Logan, promised to kill

     

    the bill once it landed on his side of

    the Capitol. Opposition from the

     

    Senate leadership is usually enough to stop any bill, no

    matter how

     

    popular.

     

     

    Still, when the smokeless tobaccotax passed the House on

     

    a 60 to 38 vote, Crickenberger

    allowed herself to hope. The bill had

     

    two hurdles to clear before it could make it to the floor

    of the

     

    Senate: the Health and Human Resources Committee, and the Finance

     

    Committee. It cleared

    The Gazette now offers Facebook Comments on its stories. You must be logged into your Facebook account to add comments. If you do not want your comment to post to your personal page, uncheck the box below the comment. Comments deemed offensive by the moderators will be removed, and commenters who persist may be banned from commenting on the site.
    Advertisement - Your ad here
    West Virginia has a long, sad tradition of political corruption. So, how does West Virginia compare to other states when requiring disclosures from politicians about potential conflicts of interest? How comprehensive are the state's reporting requirements for lobbyists? How have campaign contributions and lobbyist spending affected legislation? Find out in this series.
    Advertisement - Your ad here
    Advertisement - Your ad here
    Inside wvgazette.com