November 18, 2009
Report details 'coal's assault on human health'
Advertiser

Read more in Coal Tattoo

CHARLESTON, W.Va. -- Coal pollution is assaulting human health through impacts on workers, residents near mining operations and power plants, and the environment in coalfield communities, according to a new report by a group of physicians.

The report by Physicians for Social Responsibility examined coal's impacts on major organ systems of the human body, from the lungs to the brain.

"The findings of the report are clear: While the U.S. relies heavily on coal for its energy needs, the consequences of that reliance for our health are grave," said Dr. Alan J. Lockwood, a University of Buffalo neurologist and principal author of the report.

The 65-page report, released Wednesday morning, notes that coal provides nearly half of the nation's electricity "and is a significant contributor to economic development, a higher standard of living, and an increased life expectancy."

But, coal combustion releases mercury, particulate matter, nitrogen oxide, sulfur dioxide and dozens of other substances known to be hazardous to human health. The report, "Coal's Assault on Human Health," looks at the cumulative harm inflicted by those pollutants on the respiratory system, the cardiovascular system and the nervous system.

Among the findings:

* Respiratory system -- Air pollutants associated with coal combustion contribute to serious respiratory ailments, including asthma, lung disease and lung cancer. They also adversely affect normal lung development in children.

Report a violation or offensive comment.
[X] Close
to report abuse.
Posted By: nozingers (8:53am 11-19-2009)
Report Abuse


I agree that many of coal's costs have been hidden (note the past tense). This study, I think, is designed to show some of those costs. However, the study falls short by not predicting future non-carbon health effects from coal-burning. Like I wrote, the study adds no new information.

Posted By: rick (8:28am 11-19-2009)
Report Abuse


If the true costs of coal burning where honestly taken into account, it would be clear that coal is a very expensive energy source. And very damaging. Coal funded politicans continue to avoid the obvious truth.

Posted By: nozingers (7:49am 11-19-2009)
Report Abuse


This report contains nothing new. I suspect the authors may have simply written something to support their beliefs. Fort's comment brings up an interesting question. While it seems Fort purpose is to justify the coal industry, the stats he or she presents should be considered. Many of the people currently getting sick probably had their health degraded years ago, when coal plants emitted far more noncarbon pollution. We could expect younger people today, who breathe fewer particulates and lead, to escape some of these problems. So the question is this: Have we already spent enough to limit acids, metals, and particulates from power plant emissions? To answer this, we need a study that predicts future health impacts.

I deliberately omitted carbon emissions from this post because I consider that a separate issue. Future carbon health impacts are predictions. Particulate and other health effects are occurrences that have already happened and been studied.

Posted By: Fort (6:42am 11-19-2009)
Report Abuse


Whumm.....what a headline. I must be going to die tomorrow.....
Where’s the banner "SO2 LEVELS PLUMMET 70% - CLEANEST AIR IN DECADES ".

Why do we NEVER hear the true/complete story : Since 1980 CO emissions are down 79%, Lead emissions down 92% (yes that’s 92%), NO2 emissions down 46%...etc. - all during a time when GDP increased 126%, vehicle miles traveled increased 91%, energy consumption increased 29% and US population increased 34% ? We are breathing better air than our fathers (and mothers) and their fathers (and mothers) but you'd never know it by reading the Gazette.

Oh, wait, I remember now - we've got to sell papers, enflame the public with incendiary propaganda, and above all bash coal.

Advertisement - Your ad here
In West Virginia, mining companies are literally moving mountains to uncover valuable, low sulfur coal reserves. Mountaintop removal has become the dominant form of surface mining in the state. Coal operators are blasting off hilltops, and dumping leftover rock and dirt into nearby valleys. An untold amount of the state has been flattened, and hundreds of miles of streams have been buried. Find out more in this Special Report.
Advertisement - Your ad here
PRECISION TUNE
Precision Tune Auto Care is the fast, convenient and affordable solution to all of your car repai...
Advertisement - Your ad here
Inside wvgazette.com