October 10, 2009
Lawmakers surprised by benefits ban
Advertiser

CHARLESTON, W.Va. -- With the tough economic times of late, many West Virginians are having to bite the bullet and apply for government assistance, including food stamps and Temporary Assistance for Needy Families.

Some are discovering that they are permanently barred from receiving benefits because of a past felony conviction for possession, use or distribution of drugs. Department of Health and Human Resources employees are telling them that the Legislature imposed the ban - which comes as a surprise to legislators who don't recall ever voting on any such law.

After Delegate Steve Kominar, D-Mingo, relayed a constituent complaint, House Health and Human Resources Chairman Don Perdue, D-Wayne, set out to figure out what the heck was going on.

"It just seems to me that's being pretty severe," Perdue said of the lifetime ban on benefits.

He said he could envision a single mother being permanently denied much-needed assistance because of a youthful indiscretion years before.

Perdue had House research analyst (and wife of Charleston's mayor) Sara Jones do some digging - which concluded that in 1996 the Legislature adopted a legislative rule that imposed the ban.

It's no surprise, then, that Perdue and other lawmakers had no recollection of voting on the measure. The legislative rule-making process is long, laborious, monotonous - and gives tremendous power to agency heads to craft rules the way they wish.

By the time the rules bills reach the House and Senate floor, they're in multiple-page "bundles" incorporating hundreds of different rule changes for dozens of state agencies.

In the case of the food stamp ban, the rule referenced making state policy conform with federal law 7 USC 2015(B)(1) - as if legislators had time in the end-of-the-session crush to research federal code.

(Which is why some legislators, including Delegate Ron Walters, R-Kanawha, always vote against every rules bill - since it's impossible to know all the policy implications contained within each rules bundle.)

Jones' research found that West Virginia was one of 16 states that adopted the lifetime ban for food stamps or TANF benefits.

Another 22 states modified the rule - some states impose the ban only on persons convicted of drug trafficking, others provide an exemption for individuals who undergo drug rehabilitation, and others limit the ban to specific periods of time.

Twelve states and Washington, D.C., passed legislation opting out of the ban entirely.

Perdue said he would look at introducing legislation next session to modify West Virginia's ban.

Report a violation or offensive comment.
[X] Close
to report abuse.
Posted By: vashti (3:45pm 10-11-2009)
Report Abuse


i find it rather surprizing that state legislators (particularly Don Perdue who presumably would know better) would profess total ignorance of the ban on TANF and SNAP for drug felons. it has been a sticking point since it was enacted and has been brought to the attention of several legislators. they certainly did not hesitate to change the rules for TANF recipients who go to college knowing it would hurt the states ability to meet participation rates set by the feds. why they ignored the obvious double jeopardy of banning snap to convicted drug felonas is a mystery.

Advertisement - Your ad here
Advertisement - Your ad here
Advertisement - Your ad here