October 25, 2009
Workers don't like 'fat tax' proposal
Advertiser

CHARLESTON, W.Va. -- Gov. Joe Manchin's proposal last week for the Public Employees Insurance Agency to consider the possibility of imposing a "fat tax" in the form of higher premiums for overweight insurees went over like the proverbial lead balloon with state employees.

I was talking with Gordon Simmons, an organizer for state Public Employees Union UE 170, who confirmed that state employees were infuriated by the proposal, particularly in light of not getting pay raises this year and having a $500 one-time bonus promised to them, then yanked away.

He called the "fat tax" Manchin's attempt to take the last shred of dignity away from state employees, and suggested that employee morale is at an all-time low.

Meanwhile, Kanawha County Commission President Kent Carper sent a strongly worded three-page letter to PEIA Director Ted Cheatham Friday, calling the proposal punitive and discriminatory.

Carper said PEIA would be better served to follow Kanawha County's lead in requiring employees to get check-ups and blood tests.

"This effort is based on the premise that putting knowledge of their health conditions into their hands will encourage them to take steps to make improvements," he stated.

"Our approach is to emphasize the carrot and not the stick," Carper added. "We want to provide incentives and education to help our employees become healthier, not punish them if they cannot achieve dubious standards that may or may not be directly related to the quality of their health.  . . .

"PEIA should be pro-active in promoting good health and holding down health insurance costs, but incentives are much better than punitive measures," he concluded. "Alabama and North Carolina have received much criticism for trying to impose a 'fat tax' on public employees. Please do not add West Virginia to that list."

  • nn
  • I've been critical of the state Department of Education's exorbitant spending of more than $2 million a year to host training conferences at luxury resorts around the state.

    When the state Office of Technology hosts its 2009 Information Summit next week at the Charleston Civic Center, chief technology officer Kyle Schafer is taking steps to hold down expenses -- but at a potentially dubious price.

    To hold down costs, the conference has sold sponsorships to various I.T. companies.

    Sponsorships range in cost from $1,000 to be a co-host of the "social networking reception," to $1,500 to have the company logo on conference name-badge holders, and up to $4,000 each to be designated as a Platinum sponsor.

    Platinum sponsors for the summit will be Cisco, Microsoft and Verizon; with six gold sponsors ($3,000 each), including Unisys; and nine silver sponsors ($2,000 each), including AT&T and Lenovo.

    According to the Office of Technology's promotional materials, "As an event sponsor, your company will benefit from a broad menu of marketing opportunities that optimize your exposure and brand recognition to West Virginia professionals serving both public and private sector businesses."

    But what happens the first time the technology office awards a lucrative state contract to one of these prime sponsors? Think maybe the losing bidders will have grounds to protest?

  • nn
  • Report a violation or offensive comment.
    [X] Close
    to report abuse.
    Posted By: cougarcat (4:32pm 10-28-2009)
    Report Abuse


    The current payroll of state employees could easily lose a couple hundred pounds and still be too heavy!

    Posted By: Captain Obvious (7:42am 10-28-2009)
    Report Abuse


    I'm sure PEIA is alienting people on purpose to shake down their rolls. Tee off their subscribers enough, and those of them who can get on spouses' policies will simply go there and drop PEIA coverage.

    This isn't about encouraging healthy behavior. PEIA isn't looking to save money by fostering better health; they're just looking to save money.

    Posted By: ioanthe (6:44am 10-28-2009)
    Report Abuse


    Why not giving breaks to those of us that exercise? Overweight people won't be charged anymore, and it will give incentives to get out and get healthy.

    That, I believe is the proposal. That is what they did with the tobacco affidavit - if you are tobacco-free, you get reduced rates.

    Posted By: dude77 (10:03pm 10-27-2009)
    Report Abuse


    Why not giving breaks to those of us that exercise? Overweight people won't be charged anymore, and it will give incentives to get out and get healthy.

    Advertisement - Your ad here
    Advertisement - Your ad here
    Advertisement - Your ad here