October 28, 2009
Long road ahead on Nitro health jurisdiction debate
Advertiser

CHARLESTON, W.Va. -- Members of Nitro's City Council and the Putnam County Health Board met for the first time Tuesday evening to discuss a proposed agreement to put Nitro under Putnam County's jurisdiction, but officials are far from making a decision.

"Last night's meeting really raised more questions than answers," said Putnam County Commissioner Joe Haynes, a member of the county's health board.

Nitro officials want the Putnam health department to cover the city in order to bypass Kanawha County's smoking ban, which affects Nitro's Tri-State Racetrack and Gaming Center.

In no case would Nitro be annexed into Putnam County, Haynes said. The only thing that would change is Putnam County would be responsible for all health inspections, and medical and other services offered through the health department, he said.

Gambling would still remain illegal in Putnam County, and the county would not receive any tax revenue from Tri-State, Haynes said.

"It sounded like last night, if everything went their way, the best we could do is break even," he said. "It still doesn't give an incentive for Putnam County."

Putnam County already provides services to about one-third of Nitro's population; the Kanawha-Charleston Health Department serves the rest. The Kanawha-Putnam county line runs through Nitro, but the racetrack is in Kanawha County.

"We are in Putnam County. People forget that," Nitro City Councilman Craig Matthews said Tuesday evening. "It's not like we're coming from Mars with this."

A merger would put about 3,750 additional people under Putnam's jurisdiction in addition to about 40 businesses.

Nitro High and Nitro Elementary schools would also go under the Putnam health department's jurisdiction, but the schools would remain under the Kanawha County Board of Education.

Putnam Health Department Director Jackie Fleshman also asked Nitro city council members Tuesday what would happen if Putnam County enacted a smoking ban.

"We would certainly try to persuade you otherwise," Matthews said. But that decision is for the board and county citizens to make, he said.

The racetrack has lost about $9 million from the smoking ban -- about $300,000 a month, Matthews said.

Report a violation or offensive comment.
[X] Close
to report abuse.
Posted By: SamCogar (6:05am 10-30-2009)
Report Abuse


Local appointed boards make the best most protection laws!

Sure they do. And they also SELECTIVELY choose which businesses and entities must abide by those Laws …… and also SELECTIVELY choose which entities that they will monitor or inspect to insure that they are complying with said Laws.

The local Health Board’s “selective choosings” are nothing more than a blatant case of Partisan Politics being perpetrated upon the citizens.

Posted By: promixer (9:46am 10-29-2009)
Report Abuse


Why not a statewide law? In WV that means less protection for workers. The tobacco industry and gaming want the issue at the state level so they can exempt out any protection on bar and gaiming workers. A statewide law is a permanent death sentnece for these places! Local appointed boards make the best most protection laws!

Posted By: two traveling nuts (8:46am 10-29-2009)
Report Abuse


Why doesn't West Virginia do like several others states have done or will be by 2010? Several states have issued statewide smoking bans, which includes restaurants, bars and even private clubs. If issued statewide, this would avoid controversies on trying to join an adjacent county's health board.

Stop the nonsense and just issue a statewide ban! Our neighboring state, Ohio, has a statewide ban on smoking and it's working for them.

Advertisement - Your ad here
Advertisement - Your ad here
Advertisement - Your ad here