March 11, 2013
Big debate on bill to ban insurance cancellations
Advertiser

CHARLESTON, W.Va. -- In West Virginia and most other states, an insurer can choose not to renew people's property insurance policy if a claim is filed over weather damage.

A West Virginia Senate bill that would ban that practice was heavily debated on Monday as lobbyists for trial lawyers and the insurance industry made their cases before the Banking and Insurance Committee.

There are strict regulations governing when an insurance company can cancel a policy. Unpaid premiums and delinquent taxes can cause homeowners to lose their insurance policy.

But there are a couple of loopholes that allow insurers to, instead of canceling a policy, simply decline to renew it. Insurers can choose not to renew if they pay out two claims within a three-year period. An even broader loophole, insurers can also choose not to renew for "other valid underwriting reasons which involve a substantial increase in the risk."

The proposed bill would bar insurers from denying renewals because of any claims arising from "natural causes."

Jill Rice, president of the West Virginia Insurance Federation, said statistics show that people who file claims are far more likely to file future claims. She said it was unfair to ask all insurance customers to subsidize certain high-risk clients.

"If I have a weather-related claim that shows statistically that I am more likely to have another weather-related claim," Rice said.

Scott Blass, president of the West Virginia Association for Justice, a group of plaintiffs' lawyers, said that insurers were taking advantage of the loophole to deny renewals for people who filed legitimate claims.

"They consider it a substantial underwriting risk if somebody makes a claim," Blass said. "People have been insured for 25-30 years. They have one claim, a hailstorm, a windstorm, something they have no control over. What happens to these people because they are non-renewed? When they go into the market it is virtually impossible to get replacement coverage."

Some senators thought that adding more regulations to insurance companies could cause them to leave the state, leading to less competition in the market.

"My concern is if we keep putting in all these limitations we'll have less companies wanting to do business here," said Sen. Brooks McCabe, D-Kanawha. "What we really want is as many companies as we can."

Sen. Mike Hall, R-Putnam, co-owns an insurance agency and objected to the increased regulation.

Recommended Stories

Copyright 2013 . All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Popular Videos
The Gazette now offers Facebook Comments on its stories. You must be logged into your Facebook account to add comments. If you do not want your comment to post to your personal page, uncheck the box below the comment. Comments deemed offensive by the moderators will be removed, and commenters who persist may be banned from commenting on the site.
Advertisement - Your ad here
Get Daily Headlines by E-Mail
Sign up for the latest news delivered to your inbox each morning.
Advertisement - Your ad here
News Videos
Advertisement - Your ad here
Advertisement - Your ad here