May 10, 2012
Disturbing: Voters pick convict

CHARLESTON, W.Va. -- It's disgusting that 72,544 West Virginia Democrats dislike President Obama so intensely that they voted for a Texas prison convict instead in Tuesday's primary election.

Of course, most didn't know they were choosing a criminal. They simply picked "anyone but Obama." The inmate outpolled the president in nine counties. Further, about 25,000 other West Virginia Democratic voters skipped the presidential race entirely.

Although Obama easily won, it's nonetheless a blemish on the state that Keith Judd -- confined to a federal cell -- took 41 percent of West Virginia Democratic votes, almost the same number garnered by Republican Mitt Romney.

YOU MUST FOLLOW THESE RULES TO POST A COMMENT:

  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, sexually explicit, racist or offensive will be removed. If you wouldn?t say it to your mother, don't post it here.
  • Be civil. Don't threaten to hurt anyone. Personal attacks, insults or harassment of any kind are subject to removal.
  • Be truthful. Don't lie about a situation or person.
  • Keep it brief. Keep your comment to one post. Redundant or multiple posts in a row aren?t allowed.
  • Stay on task. Stick to the topics relevant to the story and discussion.
  • Let us know about offensive comments. Click the 'Report Abuse' button if you think a comment is against the rules.
  • NOTICE TO READERS:
    The Gazette values readers' comments and insights. So, to create a more constructive and civil setting for readers, we're making a few changes. Comments will no longer appear immediately, but will show up after they have been reviewed and approved. Also, we will be more selective about comments that we approve. We welcome wit and wisdom and, yes, dissent, but personal attacks, remarks in poor taste or those overly critical or irrational will not be published. We encourage you to keep posting. We just ask that you keep it civil.
    Submitting as:

    Tags: 0 / 1000
    31 Comments
    Posted By: BCL1722
    Report Abuse


    I'm not so sure this is a blemish on the State. May be just the start of an "anybody but Owe-bama" movement. I am sure, however, that all the 70,000 voters will now be called "dino's" since they didn't vote the way the Gazette told them to.
    Posted at: May 10, 2012 4:36:28 pm

    Posted By: MU05
    Report Abuse


    I certainly have no problem with people voting against President Obama. We live in a free country and voting against the President is your right. However, I believe that WV Secretary of State Natalie Tennant is worthless and should be impeached. She knowingly disenfranchised everyone who cast their vote for a felon (someone who couldn't possibly fulfill the minimum requirements of the office) by allowing him to be placed on the ballot. She claims she has no legal authority to investigate candidates or determine if they are eligible. Really??? Then why do we even have a Secretary of State? If that's true, then anybody could seek any elected office no matter what the constitutional requirements might be...and she couldn't do anything about it. If that's the way she interprets her job duties, then the requirement that says you must have a law degree to be a prosecutor or judge is merely a suggestion. Sad, sad, sad.
    Posted at: May 11, 2012 1:12:22 am

    Posted By: LAEer
    Report Abuse


    Actually, I think it makes West Virginians look brilliant and out of the box rather than mind-numbed robots like most of the country. This coming from me who lives in the MOST embarrassing city in the US, Los Angeles
    Posted at: May 11, 2012 2:51:54 am

    Posted By: Sam-Cogar
    Report Abuse


    It is understandable that the Gazette Editor or Editorial Board is so irately upset given the fact that 97,544 registered WV Democrats, ….. that bothered to vote that is, ….. didn’t agree with the choice of POTUS Candidate that the Gazette has been telling them they should cast their vote for.
    Posted at: May 11, 2012 5:25:33 am

    Posted By: Blayne
    Report Abuse


    You just don't get it; obama is the national (and international) embarrassment.
    Posted at: May 11, 2012 5:36:15 am

    Posted By: mark83vt
    Report Abuse


    It was hilarious to see Judd get so many votes. It just goes to show what Obama faces this election. It forced him to completely flip-flop on a major social issue, just to try to drum up a few more votes. The guy is desperate.
    Posted at: May 11, 2012 7:30:02 am

    Posted By: NPanhandle
    Report Abuse


    Anyone who doesn't think this is a disgusting blemish on West Virginia obviously lives in some backward hollow-bred bubble.
    Posted at: May 11, 2012 7:34:09 am

    Posted By: Red Dragon 70
    Report Abuse


    Isn't it interesting that while Judd got 68% (72K vs 105K) of the vote total that Obama received from "thinking" WV voters; the incarcerated icon received 95% of the vote total from diligent citizens that Romney got (72K vs 75K).

    Now is this really sad commentary on the POTUS, the Presidential wannabee, or the "thinking" of the people of West Virginia?
    Posted at: May 11, 2012 7:43:36 am

    Posted By: Patience
    Report Abuse


    Yes, this is a blemish - or, more accurately, a whopping big embarrassment - because it shows that voters didn't bother to do any homework whatsoever. If you wanted to show disdain for President Obama, all you had to do was not vote at all for a presidential candidate (since, as the Gazette noted, not voting shows up as disapproval, too). Instead, these voters have succeeded in making West Virginia the nationwide butt of even more jokes. Well done, you jerks.

    As for Judd's application being accepted by Ms. Tennant, I agree with the Gazette's question - why was he allowed on the ballot at all? Did anyone in Ms. Tennant's office check whether he met eligibility requirements? If not, why not? If so, if they knew he's sitting in prison, why would they not go to a judge, then, to have him ruled ineligible?
    Posted at: May 11, 2012 7:58:22 am

    Posted By: Mountaineer In Texas
    Report Abuse


    Don't worry Gaz. Obama's flip flop flop flip on gay marriage and his other political pandering will make everyone love his ecomonic policies. Everyone will love Obamacare, after we "...read the bill to find out what's in it." If this isn't a wake up call for Democrats I don't know what it will take.
    I love West Virginians. Mountaineers are truly free! I am proud of each and every one who voted to send that message.
    Democrats in case you missed it - the issue is JOBS, JOBS, JOBS. The kind of good, skilled, well paying jobs that a war on coal and other domestic energy kills. Of course, that is the one thing Obama can't talk about.
    Posted at: May 11, 2012 8:01:31 am

    Posted By: wjohn101
    Report Abuse


    Would have to disagree with Mike Stuart, I was proud of our state and it was a hilarious result. I see Romney winning our state 400,000 to 100,000 against the Obama wrecking crew. So allow me a great laugh - hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.
    Posted at: May 11, 2012 8:02:44 am

    Posted By: unbiased2
    Report Abuse


    Natalie could have saved the state all this embarrassment by simply rejecting Judd's application and make him sue.
    She's apparently not up to the job.
    Posted at: May 11, 2012 8:14:45 am

    Posted By: unbiased2
    Report Abuse


    Obviously Tennant fumbled the ball---she could have simply rejected the application. She must be mortified.
    Posted at: May 11, 2012 8:27:49 am

    Posted By: gmhoover
    Report Abuse


    "Of course, most didn't know they were choosing a criminal."

    Take a good long look in the mirror editor. If they didn't know Mr. Judd is a convicted felon; why didn't they? Many West Virginians unfortunately depend upon the disinformation printed in this newspaper. That's why!! You are supposed to be informing the public in an honest manner, especially as it relates to political matters. But, you cannot help yourself. You have sipped at the fountain of the PC crowd until you no longer want good clean drinking water. It doesn't suit your tastes anymore. Time to wrap up your paper and move to the San Fran area. They will love you there!
    Posted at: May 11, 2012 8:32:28 am

    Posted By: jsned
    Report Abuse


    I have laughed for days. This is not a blemish on WV voters, it is a blemish on our President and his policies. Nothing has pleased me more than this in years except the Orange Bowl win. I don't recall but didn't the gazette endorse our Secretary of State last election? Just goes to show you how utterly out of touch your endorsements usually are. I really think I pulled a stomach muscle from laughing so hard. Maybe I won't be so amused come November but for now I am going to enjoy your bewilderment.
    Posted at: May 11, 2012 9:03:18 am

    Posted By: string theory
    Report Abuse


    Per the Washington Post column on Wednesday, 20% of West Virginians consider color of skin when making a decision of who to vote for.

    You would expect a stat. like that to be under-reported, for most people do not own up to being racist.

    The cause of this election result are glaringly obvious.

    For those claiming it was a protest of the administration's "war on coal," consider WV is mining more coal than ever, and employment in the mines is at a 17 year high, despite the trend of increasing mechanization.

    This vote was a national, even an international, embarrassment.
    Posted at: May 11, 2012 9:27:40 am

    Posted By: xnavygunner
    Report Abuse


    The Gazette is so far left, that voting against Obama is disgusting. It's good to see the intellectual idiots show their true colors and how they view those who dare disagree with them and their president.
    Posted at: May 11, 2012 9:59:31 am

    Posted By: cg
    Report Abuse


    Shameful that West Virginians don't mind looking ignorant. It doesn't matter whether you wanted to vote against Pres. Obama you should at least be informed enough to know who you are voting for. To not have basic facts shows ignorance. Is there any people wonder why WV has a negative reputation.
    Posted at: May 11, 2012 10:18:38 am

    Posted By: Monroe
    Report Abuse


    Red Dragon 70 wrote"

    "Isn't it interesting that while Judd got 68% (72K vs 105K) of the vote total that Obama received from "thinking" WV voters; the incarcerated icon received 95% of the vote total from diligent citizens that Romney got (72K vs 75K). "
    -------------
    No, it is not interesting. Your post is a desperate attempt to spin this.

    Aren't all the people who voted for the felon rather than Obama Democrats? Maybe Independents can vote in the Dem primary but I don't think so.

    NPanhandle wrote:
    "Anyone who doesn't think this is a disgusting blemish on West Virginia obviously lives in some backward hollow-bred bubble."

    NPanhandle usually thinks that anyone who has a different opinion from him is a... you chose the string of negative adjectives. Such is the nature of the open minded liberal left. Plus, within their ranks, there is very little room for thinking other than the party line.
    Posted at: May 11, 2012 1:23:47 pm

    Posted By: Blayne
    Report Abuse


    Frankly, it's more disturbing obama got 60%.
    Posted at: May 11, 2012 1:35:23 pm

    Posted By: joe46and2
    Report Abuse


    Uh, James, even if you think it is embarassment, it is not embarassing for all West Virginians, just West Virginia Democrats. I don't think Judd was anywhere on the Republican ballot.
    Posted at: May 11, 2012 2:58:52 pm

    Posted By: JustRight
    Report Abuse


    Disgusting, James? I think it is rather telling. It also should come as no surprise to anyone, just based on his attempt to kill the state's economy through his EPA. But there are many other reasons that Comrade O will be another Democrat one-termer.

    Perhaps, James, it might benefit your paper's business model to reflect upon how, once again, you couldn't be more irrelevant to the market you serve.

    Or, you can write another elitist editorial that looks down your nose at all your dumb, toothless, uneducated, God 'n' Guns readers.
    Posted at: May 11, 2012 3:25:47 pm

    Posted By: ditmadden2
    Report Abuse


    Shame on Natalie Tennett!

    http://www.courtswv.gov/supreme-court/docs/spring2012/12-0185.pdf
    Posted at: May 11, 2012 9:10:34 pm

    Posted By: Sam-Cogar
    Report Abuse


    NPanhandle, those West Virginia that you claim are living in some backward hollow-bred bubble were smart enough to know they were voting in a Primary election and thus your cited “95% of the vote total from diligent citizens that Romney got (72K vs 75K)” actually means that 147,000+ West Virginia voters voiced their dislike and contempt for your man Obama.

    Save your “tears” because you will really be “crying” when the General election vote tallies are published in November.
    Posted at: May 12, 2012 5:52:36 am

    Posted By: Red Dragon 70
    Report Abuse


    @ wjohn101 who says,

    "Would have to disagree with Mike Stuart, I was proud of our state and it was a hilarious result. I see Romney winning our state 400,000 to 100,000 against the Obama wrecking crew. So allow me a great laugh - hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha."

    Ahh, but the last laugh is the best laugh! Let me give you your props and "our state" crushes President Obama in November 400,000 to 100,000 (which will be far from the case). Where do you see the path for Romney to get the other 265 other electoral votes he'll need to be successful. I can already count 257 sure electoral votes for the POTUS.

    Yes, the last laugh is the best laugh, and mine will last four more years! Kinda makes you want to go, Hmmmmmm!
    Posted at: May 12, 2012 6:58:04 am

    Advertisement - Your ad here
    More Opinion
    Advertisement - Your ad here
    Inside wvgazette.com