June 2, 2008
Clean coal
Little progress yet
Advertiser

WEST Virginia sorely needs "clean coal" technology breakthroughs to let the state's mammoth energy reserves be burned without harmful pollution - but, so far, prospects keep evaporating.

American Electric Power originally planned a $1.2 billion "integrated gasification combined cycle" generating plant in Mason County alongside its Mountaineer coal-fired plant. But the estimated cost soared past $2 billion, perhaps heading toward $3 billion. Customers in West Virginia and Virginia would be forced to pay the tab.

Six weeks ago, Virginia regulators vetoed the project, saying the skyrocketing cost "represents an extraordinary risk that we cannot allow the ratepayers of Virginia ... to assume." As a result, plans are in limbo.

The IGCC plant would have turned coal into gas, then burned the gas to drive turbines. The worst pollutant - carbon dioxide, chief suspect as a "greenhouse gas'' responsible for global warming - wouldn't have been captured. But the power utility said such capture might be feasible in the future.

At the adjoining Mountaineer Plant, AEP spent $533 million for scrubbers to remove 98 percent of sulfur dioxide fumes, the chief cause of acid rain, and is paying $70 million more for one of the world's first "sequestration" operations. Carbon dioxide will be captured from smokestacks, compressed into liquid, then pumped 8,000 feet underground for storage in porous rock layers.

However, as reporter Ken Ward Jr. explained, the latter project is only a pilot test. The plant spews 9.3 million tons of CO2 annually, and just 110,000 tons will be sequestered. That's about 1 percent "clean coal," so far.

Meanwhile, the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change concluded last year that sequestration is unproven and perhaps decades away from producing tangible benefits. The IPCC, a network of 2,000 international scientists, shared last year's Nobel Peace Prize with former Vice President Al Gore.

As we said, West Virginia anxiously waits for scientists to devise methods to remove coal's hurtful side-effects, but it isn't happening fast enough.

A start-up Huntington firm, American Algae Growers Corp., wants to use waste CO2 from power plants to grow huge vats of algae, which can be converted into biodiesel fuel, ethanol, fertilizing compost and other commodities, even food.  A few other U.S. plants are attempting this process. This nonpolluting, nature-friendly concept should be explored and promoted.

And don't forget that "clean coal" also means cleaning up ravages, pollution and hazards in regions where mining occurs. Therefore, enforcement of federal and state safeguards must never become lax.

Report a violation or offensive comment.
[X] Close
to report abuse.
Posted By: joe schmoe (2:10pm 06-03-2008)
Report Abuse


"The worst pollutant - carbon dioxide"

Those five words sum up the ignorance of the gazette editorial staff pretty well. Fine particulate from coal fired power plants kill thousands in the US every year. SO2, mercury and NOx poison the air and water. But the gazette is worried about CO2. Hilarious.

Posted By: wvcoalminer (3:44am 06-03-2008)
Report Abuse


Clean coal is not possible. Neither is so called "green technoligies" such as wind, solar, etc. ALL FORMS OF ENERGY PRODUCTION CAUSES SOME FORM OF CARBON FOOTPRINT. PEROID. The idea is to get coal's carbon footprint smaller than it currently is.

Posted By: FactsNotMentioned (11:14pm 06-02-2008)
Report Abuse


For j and dto71 and who ever else um these same "green" advocacy groups you hold so dear to are also the same ones that have blocked alternative energy available, like several wind farm projects blocked from being built in this state(one project being funded by a Shell oil subsidiary, luv how ya clammor that oil companies are not into alternatives by the way), nuclear is out of the question as well thanks, greenies, but don't tell France or Canada that. Your practices are putting a stangle hold on this country that will choke the US economy. I have NO problems with alternative forms of energy as long as it is cost effective and it is not there yet. Until then we must use what we have. The government should not be the solution,and asking the government to solve it, good luck with that. They can't manage anything properly. If you can find a way you would be a billionaire. For you greenies,why are the polar caps on Mars shrinking?As well as other planets warming? Explain that

Posted By: Jesus'LoveMuffin (9:35pm 06-02-2008)
Report Abuse


I agree with the Republican. Keep coal(energy) cheap and allow everyone, especially the "greenies", who can't afford a yacht, a breathing apparatus, and 1000 SPF suntan lotion to die a slow painful death... cuz by saving a dollar we save ourselves and have more of ourselves to give to Christ.

Advertisement - Your ad here
Advertisement - Your ad here
Advertisement - Your ad here