July 10, 2008
Horror
Protect women
Advertiser

CHARLESTON'S grotesque domestic violence murder during the July 4 weekend showed, once again, how difficult it is to protect women from brutal, controlling, dangerous, raging spouses or boyfriends - especially those who carry illegal pistols.

Nalisha Gravely, 19, was shot to death savagely in the Patrick Street Taco Bell, despite years of court attempts to keep her safe from the criminal father of her 2-year-old son.

The teenage mother evidently was part of the problem, because she had failed to prosecute Desmond Clark, 22, after previous attacks. In fact, she was riding quietly in his vehicle just before the murder and said nothing to a Dunbar officer who stopped them.

A Dunbar sergeant stopped Clark's maroon Tahoe for veering left of center before daylight Saturday, then smelled marijuana in the vehicle. A search found a small stash of pot, but no gun. Clark gallantly said the dope belonged to him alone, absolving her. He was charged with possession and driving on a suspended license. The Tahoe, registered to his mother, was impounded.

Gravely said nothing to police to imply that she was in danger. She called a friend to pick them up.

Yet within a few hours, police believe, the boyfriend had retrieved the Tahoe from impoundment, armed himself with a pistol, and killed her with a fusillade as she hid in the restaurant.

It was illegal for Clark to carry a gun because he's a convicted felon and also under domestic violence protective orders. But laws didn't prevent him from going armed, any more than they shielded the young woman from harm.

This nightmare should spur police, prosecutors and legislators to try harder to find ways to protect abused women. Gravely had filed several charges that Clark had stabbed, shot, choked, beat and menaced her, yet he wasn't locked in a cell. At the time of the murder, he was under a court order forbidding him to have contact with her until Aug. 28. Yet they rode together just before the killing.

Last year, after pleading guilty to watered-down charges, Clark was placed on home confinement. But he cut off his tracking bracelet and was charged with escape. Later, he was freed on probation because he allegedly had a job as security guard at a West Side barbershop. What sort of barbershop needs a paid guard - and what shop would hire a convicted felon for the task?

Police say that Clark was not a police informant, but other sources say he was, and that's why he was on the street, even with his record.

The Rev. Matthew Watts says Gravely was a "beautiful, intelligent girl" - yet her life was snuffed out before she turned 20. Why did the domestic violence system fail to protect her, and why did she keep returning to her barbaric boyfriend?

Although most men never hurt women, West Virginia nonetheless has a dismal rate of domestic murders. Usually, the raging man kills himself after gunning down the woman he has battered and hounded for months or years. Charleston's July 5 tragedy was somewhat atypical.

Authorities must examine this sad case to seek better methods to avert future horrors.

7 Comments on "Horror"
Post a comment
Report a violation or offensive comment.
[X] Close
to report abuse.
Posted By: Fed Up (7:07pm 07-12-2008)
Report Abuse


It is very sad that public safety is at risk when suspects of violence are released of all charges because they possess information the police deem as vital information (reality, police are inept). Now that this animal has been caged, his rights will be protected. What happened to Nalisha's rights. Judges, Prosecutors, Attoneys, Police ACLU, and all other civil liberty advocates need to get off of their blessed assurances and stop protecting the rights of these low life non productive individuals. Why wasn't he shipped to Iraq, since he wants to hurt people. As long as their is room for bargaining, more innocent victoims like Nalisha will suffer harm or great losses.

Posted By: pam (1:07am 07-12-2008)
Report Abuse


in my previous comment I mistakenly typed the word "country" instead of "county" when I was referring to a family law judge who is female and is very lenient on abusers. She consistently is easy on the most violent of men. As I stated before she is either afraid of them...or she is one of the women who are the first to turn on other women.

Posted By: pam (12:54am 07-12-2008)
Report Abuse


There is no excuse for the writer of this editorial to even hint that this young woman was to blame. This paper is just like most other media in this country, basically a sexist organization.
Women still have the same problems that they've always had.
Most judges, police and prosecutors don't take crimes against women and children seriously. ( and that includes so-called "family law" judges...who are female in this country.) There is one judge who would bend over backwards to let the male abuser off every time. Is she afraid of them or does she want so badly to be seen as one of the good ol boys?
I don't think it matters if the woman is black or white...there is no justice for women ...and children.

Posted By: Saddened (12:00am 07-12-2008)
Report Abuse


Someone needs to educate these young women to get them to understand that there IS a way out of these kinds of situations. Granted, she may have felt powerless; but she had options that she simply did not know about due to ignorance. Ignorance in any arena often comes with a penalty.

Advertisement - Your ad here
Advertisement - Your ad here
ROUTE 21 DINER
Route 21 Diner (formerly Shotguns) is a family owned and run country restaurant. We're open for ...
Deal of the Day - ROUTE 21 DINER
10% off delivery orders
Advertisement - Your ad here