October 29, 2009
Quagmire: Afghan war futility
Advertiser

CHARLESTON, W.Va. -- Fourteen U.S. troops were killed in Afghanistan Monday, followed by eight more Tuesday, bringing the October toll to 55, the worst monthly loss. This painful tally is doubly tragic because most Americans now realize that the costly U.S. sacrifice in the wild mountain land accomplishes little.

Eight years ago, just after the historic 9/11 terrorism strike, it was appropriate for American forces to help northern tribes expel the fanatical Taliban regime that sheltered al-Qaida murderers. However, the Bush White House soon tired of Afghanistan and switched instead to the unnecessary Iraq invasion. Both Middle East war zones became quagmires.

Today, the Afghan struggle is futile, according to a gung-ho U.S. officer who worked hard in a combat region, then decided it was pointless. Former Marine Capt. Matthew Hoh went to southern Afghanistan as a State Department operative against Taliban insurgents. Now he has quit, submitting a damning letter of resignation, which was leaked in Tuesday's Washington Post.

Capt. Hoh wrote that primitive fundamentalist Afghan tribes are fighting simply because they consider U.S. soldiers to be foreign intruders in their country -- just as they previously considered Russian occupiers in the 1980s.

"Like the Soviets, we continue to secure and bolster a failing state, while encouraging an ideology and system of government unknown and unwanted by its people," his letter said.

Afghanistan is a feudal patchwork of "tribes, valleys, clans, villages and families," he wrote. Recurring conflict "has violently and savagely pitted the urban, secular, educated and modern of Afghanistan against the rural, religious, illiterate and traditional," he said. The latter segment of backward people drove out Russians two decades ago, and now they fight to expel Americans.

"I have observed that the bulk of the insurgency fights not for the white banner of the Taliban, but rather against the presence of foreign soldiers and taxes imposed by an unrepresentative government in Kabul," Capt. Hoh wrote.

The departing State Department agent said Washington misunderstood the Afghan enemy -- and sent young Americans to die for bungled reasons. If Washington really intends to attack places where al-Qaida breeds, he wrote, it "would require us to additionally invade and occupy western Pakistan, Somalia, Sudan, Yemen, etc." -- as well as Western Europe, where Muslim fanatic cells proliferate.

The ex-Marine captain likened the U.S. role in Afghanistan to that of King Sisyphus, who was condemned to push a boulder up a hill, from whence it endlessly rolled down and had to be pushed up again. "We are mortgaging our nation's economy on a war which, even with increased commitment, will remain a draw for years to come," he said.

President Obama is pondering whether to send more U.S. troops as a "surge" into Afghanistan. If he does so, it will echo the sad U.S. escalation in Vietnam a generation ago, which never produced victory. We think Obama should try instead to extract America from the endless nightmare in the Afghan mountains.

Report a violation or offensive comment.
[X] Close
to report abuse.
Posted By: St. George (7:46am 11-03-2009)
Report Abuse


Focus on Al-Qaeda, deal with them, and be done with it.

Posted By: smarbap (6:41pm 11-01-2009)
Report Abuse


We have apparently learned nothing from our experience in Vietnam. When sending our armed forces into conflict, we must have a clear objective, the support of the American people for our intervention, and the will to use whatever means are necessary to destroy the enemy.

As was the case in Vietnam, in Afghanistan our objective keeps changing, our citizenry does not wholeheartedly support the intervention, and yet another Democrat president and Democrat Congress does not have the will to use whatever means are necessary to destroy the enemy.

As the French failed first in Vietnam, and the British and Soviets failed first in Afghanistan, we have assumed the role of idiot by doing the same thing in hopes of achieving a different outcome.

Posted By: AaronS (10:05am 11-01-2009)
Report Abuse


The problem with this war is the objective changed. We're no longer searching OBL and fighting Al Qaeda, we are trying to build another nation and it is not our place. Save Special Forces units supported by air and naval missiles left to search out terrorist training camps, we need to bring our troops home as we cannot win the hearts and minds of the Afghan people.

Posted By: EB (11:49am 10-30-2009)
Report Abuse


Being an Obama mouthpiece, the Gazette conveniently forgets to mention Obama's election-year brag that Afghanistan was "the real war" and that he was going to win it once he took office.

"Like the Soviets, we continue to secure and bolster a failing state, while encouraging an ideology and system of government unknown and unwanted by its people."

I presume Koh asked the women of Afghanistan whether they "want" a regime that treats them like animals.

Advertisement - Your ad here
Advertisement - Your ad here
ROUTE 21 DINER
Route 21 Diner (formerly Shotguns) is a family owned and run country restaurant. We're open for ...
Deal of the Day - ROUTE 21 DINER
10% off delivery orders
Advertisement - Your ad here