November 9, 2008
Ed Feulner
Obama's win should please conservatives
Advertiser

How fitting that, having campaigned on conservative themes throughout the fall, President-elect Barack Obama's acceptance speech concluded with words that should warm the hearts of conservatives everywhere.

"This is our time,'' he said, to "reaffirm that fundamental truth that, out of many, we are one. That while we breathe, we hope. And where we are met with cynicism and doubts and those who tell us that we can't, we will respond with that timeless creed that sums up the spirit of a people: Yes, we can.''

An abiding belief in our country's greatness, tinged with optimism, has long been a cornerstone of conservatism. And Obama's been tacitly leaning toward conservative ideas since he became the Democratic nominee. Even though his record indicated he was the most liberal candidate in (at least) a generation, he took some conservative positions on issues like taxes (promising to cut them), homeland security (strengthening border security) and energy (saying he'd at least consider offshore drilling).

This is no surprise, since poll after poll showed Americans remain fundamentally conservative.

For example, an October Rasmussen survey found that 59 percent of voters agree that government is the problem and not the solution. Just 28 percent disagree with that conservative tenet.

On taxes, the same survey found that 58 percent of voters favor tax cuts over another stimulus bill containing new government spending. Only 32 percent think the government should pass another economic stimulus package.

Another survey, taken less than a week before the election by the Tarrance Group and Lake Research Partners, showed that 57 percent of Americans called themselves "somewhat conservative'' or "very conservative.'' Only 35 percent consider themselves "somewhat liberal'' or "very liberal.''

The problem is that both political parties have failed Americans.

In recent years the Republican Party, which in Reagan's hands carried the conservative standard to new heights, lost its way. Federal spending now tops $25,000 per household annually, and the coming Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid costs of 77 million retiring baby boomers threaten to add an additional $12,000 per household to the taxpayers' annual tab. Yet neither party offers a solution to the entitlement crisis or a real plan to cut spending.

Report a violation or offensive comment.
[X] Close
to report abuse.
Posted By: One Citizen (5:31pm 11-16-2008)
Report Abuse


Hoover Institution fellow and former McCain adviser Tod Lindberg doesn't buy it:

"Here’s the stark reality: It is now harder for the Republican presidential candidate to get to 50.1 percent than for the Democrat. My Hoover Institution colleague David Brady and Douglas Rivers of the research firm YouGovPolimetrix have been analyzing data from online interviews with 12,000 people in both 2004 and 2008. It shows an overall shift to the Democrats of six percentage points. As they write in the forthcoming edition of Policy Review, “The decline of Republican strength occurs by having strong Republicans become weak Republicans, weak Republicans becoming independents, and independents leaning more Democratic or even becoming Democrats.” This is a portrait of an electorate moving from center-right to center-left."

Lindberg recognizes that “the percentage of voters describe themselves as ‘liberal’ and ‘conservative’ but notes that “the views behind those labels” have shifted toward liberal

Posted By: One Citizen (1:48pm 11-15-2008)
Report Abuse


Republicans like editorialist Feulner have been doing away with oversight and privatizing government functions just so they can steal from us for the last 8 years.

By the standard of today's conservatives, if former president Dwight D. Eisenhower were alive today, he'd be considered a liberal. As a matter of fact, the granddaughter of Republican former president Dwight 'Ike' Eisenhower endorsed Democrat Barack Obama for president, saying, In his televised address, Ike famously coined the term "military-industrial complex," and he offered advice that is still relevant today. "As we peer into society's future," he said, we "must avoid the impulse to live only for today, plundering, for our own ease and convenience, the precious resources of tomorrow. We cannot mortgage the material assets of our grandchildren without risking the loss also of their political and spiritual heritage. We want democracy to survive for all generations to come, not to become the insolvent phantom of tomorrow.

Posted By: One Citizen (2:24pm 11-11-2008)
Report Abuse


If Rasmussen asks the question "do you consider yourself liberal or conservative", the answer will likely be "conservative" just because over the years the right wing has done such a great job advertising the NAME "librul" as meaning something bad.

However, election day exit polls actually report a far more accurate picture of who Americans really are as opposed to how they label themselves.

For instance, on election day, the Pew Research Center found that 51% of voters coming from the polls said that they felt Government wasn't doing enough for them while only 43% felt that government was doing too much. Proving that asking essentially the same question in a different way really took the "spin" out of corporate-owned media pollster's Rasmussen's bogus report.

http://tinyurl.com/5wdztz

The columnist Ed Fuelneris is president of The Heritage Foundation, is widely recognized as Richard Mellon Scaife's private breeding ground for his leading neo-conservatives.

Posted By: No Way Joe (10:04pm 11-10-2008)
Report Abuse


If JFK were still alive today, he'd be considered a conservative

Liberalism has become more mental illness and misdirected emotionalism than anything else

Advertisement - Your ad here
Advertisement - Your ad here
PRECISION TUNE
Precision Tune Auto Care is the fast, convenient and affordable solution to all of your car repai...
Advertisement - Your ad here