"We have some examples where coal operations have been able to take place [on DNR-managed WMAs] with minimum or no impact," Johansen said. "A prime example is Panther State Forest in McDowell County. There is deep mining all under the forest, but the mine portals are offsite so the impacts have been negligible."
Since the East Lynn tract would be deep-mined, Johansen doesn't expect much impact on the area's deer, turkey and squirrel hunting.
"What's of particular importance to us is to maintain the integrity of the lake itself," he said. "It's an incredibly important fishery for us. We want to make sure safeguards are in place so that there are no impacts to the fishery and the lake's water quality."
Based on past experiences with mining and land-holding companies throughout the southern portion of the state, Johansen expects the two companies involved in the East Lynn mining to cooperate with the DNR and other regulatory agencies.
"We don't own the land around East Lynn - we only lease it," Johansen said. "But we will be an interested party because we have the area under a license agreement.
"A number of our larger WMAs operate under license agreements with landholding companies, including mining companies, and we've found them to be really good to work with," Johansen said. "Our relationship with those companies has been very positive, and the sportsmen and sportswomen of West Virginia have benefited from the agreements that have been made through the agency."
Actual mining on East Lynn is probably years away. Environmental studies take time, and mining permits can be deucedly difficult to obtain.
If the demand for coal increases, East Lynn will probably be mined. If it is, though, the companies will have to meet requirements set forth by three agencies - the BLM, the Corps of Engineers and the DNR. In other words, it's pretty well protected.