News
July 18, 2008
Kanawha school board to vote on drug tests this fall
School board to go back to court on library funding

CHARLESTON, W.Va. - New Kanawha County school board member Robin Rector apparently backed off a campaign stance Thursday, saying it would cost too much money to involve the school system in a test court case for random drug testing.

Rector said Thursday she wants to wait on the outcome of other legal battles, like one pending in Graham County, N.C., before she would vote in favor of random drug testing.

"Is it the right way to use the money? It just doesn't seem to me it is," she said.

Still, board members voted unanimously at a meeting Thursday to advance a hard-line drug testing policy. It will be placed on public comment for 30 days beginning Aug. 21.

They also agreed, in a 4-1 vote, to go back to court to determine whether they must continue to pay one-third of the Kanawha County Public Library's annual budget. Board member Jim Crawford disagreed.        

Liking his new odds, board member Pete Thaw proposed the two votes shortly after Rector defeated incumbent Barbara Welch May 13 in the primary election.

For more than a year, Thaw tried unsuccessfully to pass random drug tests for teachers, principals, coaches, administrators, school board members and nearly all other school employees.    

Crawford said Rector "flip-flopped" from her campaign position, and pointed out that both Thaw and Rector publicly said during the heated campaign they favored random drug tests but have since changed their minds.

"Don't say 'they!'" Thaw shot back.

"I will fight for drug testing forever," he said later. "I'll never stop."

The proposed drug testing policy would allow random tests in addition to those given when drug use is suspected, after vehicle accidents or as a condition for employment.

Courts have found that random drug testing is acceptable for workers in "safety-sensitive" positions - which usually refers to school bus drivers or those who operate machinery. School board general counsel Jim Withrow said the heart of the legal argument is whether teachers, principals, coaches, aides and others are also safety-sensitive.              

Rector said her campaign position was misunderstood. She said earlier this week that she wanted the current drug policy to be "more inclusive" and test more teachers, principals and other employees, but said Thursday that doesn't mean she supports random drug testing.      

 "I could support random drug testing ... when it met the legal rigors and when those involved that will be affected have helped craft it," Rector said. "I said that time and time again. I think [Crawford] heard the first part and not the second."

Rector said Thursday she doesn't want Kanawha County to take the lead in a court battle, which might sap funds from other county services.

Advertiser
Report a violation or offensive comment.
[X] Close
to report abuse.
Posted By: KCS Student Father (9:10pm 07-20-2008)
Report Abuse


Test them all at time of hire and then randomly,This way yiu can weed out the bad teachers....Yep I said it,the ones one on drugs are put out on the street.To work at McDonalds

Posted By: J (3:14pm 07-19-2008)
Report Abuse


It "riles people up" because what they do on their own time is their own business. As long as they're not on anything at school, what's the problem?

Posted By: Luckylouie (11:01am 07-19-2008)
Report Abuse


all other occupations drug test, why not teachers, are they above the law, I dont think so. I also personally know of teacers suspended now for illegal drug use, and sale, you wont get a false positive for drugs, if you have a prescription for drugs.as becky jordan states, "she fears"
And the school board putting a price on childrens safety, by saying it costs too much to test, is absolutely ridiculous, every one on the school board should resign for the good of the students.

Posted By: SeenItAll (4:07am 07-19-2008)
Report Abuse


Drug testing riles people up, especially those who have a chip on their shoulder against teachers.People who are not using illegal drugs shouldn't care.But many teachers in KCS are older and may be on many medications. What if certain medications result in false positives? Then the teacher or staff person must be re-tested. No matter what claims of 'confidentiality', word would leak out that 'Mr. So & So failed the drug test' and an innocent person's rep would be tarnished. If parent volunteers,principals & vice principals have a lot of interaction w/staff,they could see someone behaving as a result of drugs and would have just cause to test them. Everyone wants students to be safe--and the staff. Bring drug dogs by the school often, randomly test athletes, etc.

And to 'Justice', what is this "My children's privacy is invaded each school day by the educators"? IT'S SCHOOL!That makes no sense! No wonder students sass & disrespect teachers. The chip on the shoulder doesn't fall far!

It's easy to follow the top stories with home delivery of The Charleston Gazette.

Click here to order home delivery.

Advertiser
Advertiser