December 6, 2012
TV brainwashing sports voters
Page 2 of 2
Advertiser

Peeps, this is not an award for the leader of feel-good stories. It's supposed to honor the best.

But, OK, let's address a couple of arguments. Kansas State was a terrific story this season. Bill Snyder easily received my vote for Big 12 coach of the year. Klein did a wonderful job. Some voters wish to reward the best players on the best teams.

If that's the case, though, do so. Vote for Georgia linebacker Jarvis Jones. Or Alabama guard Chance Warmack or Ohio State defensive tackle Johnathan Hankins.

The best player on Kansas State's team is linebacker Arthur Brown. On Texas A&M, it's defensive end Damontre Moore.

But those guys weren't packaged nicely and presented with a bow by television. They weren't the spiritual leaders. They didn't have "Heisman moments."

Remember, you must have the networks present and focused on you to have "Heisman moments." The networks have to decide to run such moments over and over. Manziel was fortunate there. WVU's Tavon Austin, who had 572 all-purpose yards against Oklahoma, was not.

Should voters lean on where television cameras are situated? Really? With all the statistics and technology available these days?

But back to the candidates, specifically Te'o, a very good player with a great story. He probably is the best player on No. 1 Notre Dame's team. Te'o has seven interceptions.

However, he's also ranked No. 59 nationally in tackles. Actually, the linebacker is tied at No. 59.

The best defensive player, and the one who received my No. 1 vote, was unquestionably South Carolina's Jadeveon Clowney. In my opinion, he was the most dominating player in the country offensively or defensively. Clowney finished No. 2 in sacks to a kid from Western Kentucky. He finished No. 2 in tackles for loss to Jarvis Jones, another great candidate.

Clowney wasn't the symbol of anything. He didn't have a great story or "Heisman moment." He was just the best.

Oh, and while I'm on the subject of voting, I'm going to shoot down this "eye test" deal in relation to ranking teams. You hear it all the time. I've used it to justify my votes in the past.

But what I've realized this year is most of our eyes are bad. We need new glasses. Sure one still has to use the "eye test" when voting between teams with similar resumes, losses and athletes.

My eyes, however, didn't tell me A&M would defeat Alabama. My eyes didn't tell me Baylor would beat Kansas State. My eyes sure as heck didn't tell me Notre Dame would be in the BCS title game. So until someone defeats Ohio State, which won't happen, I've been voting the Buckeyes No. 2. Prove to me Notre Dame or Alabama or any other team can beat them. I know the Crimson Tide can be defeated.

In sum, it's simply best to stick with what you know. It's best to honor those that earn rewards. And it's best to take Brent and his buddies with more than a grain of salt.

Reach Mitch Vingle at 304-348-4827, mitchvin...@wvgazette.com or follow him at twitter.com/MitchVingle.

Recommended Stories

Copyright 2012 The Charleston Gazette. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Popular Videos
The Gazette now offers Facebook Comments on its stories. You must be logged into your Facebook account to add comments. If you do not want your comment to post to your personal page, uncheck the box below the comment. Comments deemed offensive by the moderators will be removed, and commenters who persist may be banned from commenting on the site.
Advertisement - Your ad here
Advertisement - Your ad here
Advertisement - Your ad here