September 7, 2008
Early turnover seemed to trigger WVU's demise
WVU notes
Advertiser

GREENVILLE, N.C. - It's hard to argue that a play so early was the turning point. It's especially difficult to argue it when it was just West Virginia's sixth play of a game in which the Mountaineers lost so badly.

Still, what might have happened had Pat White not turned the ball over while trying to stretch for a first down?

From an optimistic WVU standpoint, the Mountaineers would have gone on to score, matching East Carolina's opening drive and knotting the game at 7. It might have been shocking if they hadn't, although they may have had to first convert a fourth-and-inches because White might have been short even with the stretch.

Instead, though, White's turnover was merely a precursor to everything else that would go wrong for West Virginia during its 24-3 loss at East Carolina Saturday. If anything could go wrong for the Mountaineers on offense, it did, and that was the play that started the snowball.

"I reached out for the first down,'' White said. "I thought I was down. But you can't argue.''

Well, actually you can, but West Virginia didn't. Perhaps it would have done no good. Perhaps White did let go of the ball before he was down, although it appeared on television replays that his right hand might have touched out of bounds just before he lost the ball while stretching it out with his left. The ball actually sat there near the sideline unbothered for a second before East Carolina's Jay Ross picked it up.

There was certainly momentary confusion among the officials on the field, only one of whom seemed sure of what he had seen and called it a fumble. But there was no long conference, the ECU offense came onto the field and ran a play and, as soon as the ball was snapped, the point was rendered moot.

So why didn't West Virginia call a timeout and ask that the play be reviewed? Each team has that right.

"If seven officials [on the field] and TV [the officials in the replay booth] can't figure it out, I certainly can't,'' Stewart said. "But that was a big, big turnover.''

Normally, the West Virginia assistant coaches in the press box would tell Stewart to challenge the ruling. They would watch the ESPN replays just like everyone else and make a quick decision on whether it is worth a challenge.

Report a violation or offensive comment.
[X] Close
to report abuse.
Posted By: bad play (4:19pm 09-08-2008)
Report Abuse


The played awful, but that call should have been challenged.
Later there was a phantom pass interference that resulted in a big ec gain.
Then the personal foul, which was deserved but should have been called on both teams.
Then the very generous spot that resulted in a ec first down.
Not necessarily game changers, but the officiating was terrible.

Posted By: WVFan (12:23am 09-08-2008)
Report Abuse


I am a loyal fan I just think that coaches you pay all kinds of money to should be able to know when to disagree with a call that could have changed the momentum of the game.

Posted By: Mac (12:20am 09-08-2008)
Report Abuse


Well I guess we're bac to mediocraty again

Posted By: unbelievable (10:20am 09-08-2008)
Report Abuse


We lost our defense last year and this is a rebuilding year. It will take a while. Still, it doesn't surprise me that WVU fans are 'conditional' fans. As long as it's a win, Stew is great. But when they lose one game, you turn into rabid pit bulls. So much for loyalty.

Advertisement - Your ad here
Advertisement - Your ad here
MC CORMICK JEWELERS
A name you have know and trusted for over 60 years for honesty, quality and fair prices. The own...
Advertisement - Your ad here