September 10, 2011
Blocking, tempo a concern for WVU offense
Advertiser

MORGANTOWN - There was no official betting line on the Norfolk State-West Virginia football game.

Unofficially, it was about 44 points. WVU almost covered that, winning 55-12 in front of 51,911 fans at Milan Puskar Stadium.

The line, though, was a big concern through the first half. The Mountaineer offensive line, that is.

I know, it's tough to nitpick when a team wins by 43 points. But last week the Mountaineers had 42 rushing yards in a shortened game. On Saturday, they had 102 ground yards against a team picked to finish fourth in the MEAC.

At one point, WVU had six tries to score from the NSU 1-yard line. They were all unsuccessful. A field goal was the result.

It led to boos. It led to the visiting Spartans hitting halftime with a 12-10 lead.

All that, you might know, was wiped out in the second half. WVU quarterback Geno Smith threw for 371 yards and four touchdowns. The Mountaineers wore down the visitors and rolled to the big win.

Still, there remained a concern with Maryland looming at College Park this coming Saturday. There remained a big concern with LSU in the immediate future. WVU coach Dana Holgorsen didn't try to hide the concern.

"Offensively, they were giving us the run all night and we weren't sustaining our blocks," he said during the post-game press conference.

Later, he expounded.

"The run game was not good," Holgorsen said. "Usually, we're targeted right. But we're not finishing blocks. We're just not. Some of it are our running backs, who are young and not getting it. It's not what we want right now. We've got to get better.

"Pass-protection-wise, we're fine. They were rushing three and dropping everybody."

Indeed, Smith was sacked but once. Backup Paul Millard wasn't sacked in mop-up duty. But the Mountaineers averaged 3.1 yards per rush - against Norfolk State. Ouch.

"They outplayed us in some parts," said WVU left tackle Don Barclay. "Sometimes it was our fault. Sometimes the backs didn't pick up a block. It was overall a team thing. We weren't on the same page. In the second half, we came out and started hitting it.

"We all got together in the locker room and said, 'We've got to get on the same page, together.' It started clicking in the second half. Everyone was making their blocks. Everyone was doing their assignments."

In that first half, WVU had 39 rushing yards on 15 carries.

"The first half, we struggled," Barclay said. "We could have blocked better. In the second half, [quarterback] Geno [Smith] was a lot more comfortable. We gave him a lot more time and he was hitting receivers. They were getting open."

It seemed the WVU offensive problem was two-fold. First, there was the line blocking. Second, the tempo necessary for success in Holgorsen's offense wasn't there until the second half. Both will have to improve quickly if an away victory is to be earned next week against Maryland, a team off this weekend.

But back to the blocking.

Recommended Stories

Copyright 2011 The Charleston Gazette. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Popular Videos
The Gazette now offers Facebook Comments on its stories. You must be logged into your Facebook account to add comments. If you do not want your comment to post to your personal page, uncheck the box below the comment. Comments deemed offensive by the moderators will be removed, and commenters who persist may be banned from commenting on the site.
Advertisement - Your ad here
Advertisement - Your ad here
Advertisement - Your ad here