August 31, 2010
India's jobs drive in Kashmir seen as only part of the solution
Advertiser

MCT NEWSFEATURES

(HAS TRIM)

By Anshul Rana and Mark Magnier

Los Angeles Times

(MCT)

SRINAGAR, India - As the death toll mounts in this summer of discontent in the Indian-controlled portion of Kashmir, government planners are turning to an old standby in their bid to calm the storm: jobs.

Officials say they hope that if young male demonstrators can be kept busy and off the streets, they will lose their fierce anger at Indian control of the disputed region and alleged human rights violations by police and paramilitary forces. At least 62 protesters, mostly youths throwing rocks, have been killed by armed security officials since June.

This month, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh announced a blue-ribbon panel to spur job creation and economic development in Kashmir. Five days later, the state's highest elected official, Chief Minister Omar Abdullah, pledged to create 50,000 government jobs in the next few months.

However, a closer look at the history of unrest in the pristine Kashmir valley, over which Pakistan and India have fought two wars, suggests the problems are so deeply rooted that throwing jobs at the volatile situation won't change much.

A prevalent view among Kashmiris and analysts alike is that economic development can succeed only if - as happened in Northern Ireland - it's preceded by a political settlement. Without some measure of stability, companies are loath to invest, workers to commute, entrepreneurs to innovate.

"Every time violence erupts in Kashmir, they want to give an economic package," said student Aasif Sultan, in a crowd of protesters. "We don't want it. We need a political package that reflects the wishes of the Kashmiri people."

Few doubt, however, that high unemployment, constant school interruptions and limited diversions make the situation worse. "The economy is war battered," said Usman Ahmad, regional director with Mercy Corps, a civic group nurturing new ventures to grow potatoes, develop software and operate call centers. "Even without political instability, it's a great challenge."

The biggest employer in the Kashmir economy, distorted by years of conflict, is the government, with about 550,000 workers out of a work force of 3.2 million; many more private-sector jobs are heavily dependent on government contracts.

Kashmir's bloated state sector, which some have termed "post-Soviet," not only undercuts social stability - because most government workers get paid even during strikes, curfews and riots - but also tends to discourage innovation.

"The men in Kashmir don't necessarily want to work," said Sana Javed, a social worker in Srinagar on leave to raise her children. "There's a psyche that government should be the benefactor, everything should be free and others should pay."

Private employers, meanwhile, are limping at best. Agriculture has suffered as farms have been divided by inheritance to the point where they're hardly productive, while irrigation projects and new growing techniques have been ignored for decades. Farm productivity, according to government figures, has declined 30 percent since the 1980s.

Article Preview

This article is available only to our premium digital content subscribers.

India's jobs drive in Kashmir seen as only part of the solution

MCT NEWSFEATURES

(HAS TRIM)

By Anshul Rana and Mark Magnier

Los Angeles Times

(MCT)

SRINAGAR, India - As the death toll mounts in this summer of discontent in the Indian-controlled portion of Kashmir, government planners are turning to an old standby in their bid to calm the storm: jobs.

Officials say they hope that if young male demonstrators can be kept busy and off the streets, they will lose their fierce anger at Indian control of the disputed region and alleged human rights violations by police and paramilitary forces. At least 62 protesters, mostly youths throwing rocks, have been killed by armed security officials since June.

This month, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh announced a blue-ribbon panel to spur job creation and economic development in Kashmir. Five days later, the state's highest elected official, Chief Minister Omar Abdullah, pledged to create 50,000 government jobs in the next few months.

However, a closer look at the history of unrest in the pristine Kashmir valley, over which Pakistan and India have fought two wars, suggests the problems are so deeply rooted that throwing jobs at the volatile situation won't change much.

A prevalent view among Kashmiris and analysts alike is that economic development can succeed only if - as happened in Northern Ireland - it's preceded by a political settlement. Without some measure of stability, companies are loath to invest, workers to commute, entrepreneurs to innovate.

"Every time violence erupts in Kashmir, they want to give an economic package," said student Aasif Sultan, in a crowd of protesters. "We don't want it. We need a political package that reflects the wishes of the Kashmiri people."

Few doubt, however, that high unemployment, constant school interruptions and limited diversions make the situation worse. "The economy is war battered," said Usman Ahmad, regional director with Mercy Corps, a civic group nurturing new ventures to grow potatoes, develop software and operate call centers. "Even without political instability, it's a great challenge."

The biggest employer in the Kashmir economy, distorted by years of conflict, is the government, with about 550,000 workers out of a work force of 3.2 million; many more private-sector jobs are heavily dependent on government contracts.

Kashmir's bloated state sector, which some have termed "post-Soviet," not only undercuts social stability - because most government workers get paid even during strikes, curfews and riots - but also tends to discourage innovation.

"The men in Kashmir don't necessarily want to work," said Sana Javed, a social worker in Srinagar on leave to raise her children. "There's a psyche that government should be the benefactor, everything should be free and others should pay."

Private employers, meanwhile, are limping at best. Agriculture has suffered as farms have been divided by inheritance to the point where they're hardly productive, while irrigation projects and new growing techniques have been ignored for decades. Farm productivity, according to government figures, has declined 30 percent since the 1980s.

1 Day Online Only
$0.99
Click here to purchase a one day subscription.
1 Month Online Only
$9.99
Click here to sign up for a one month subscription.
1 Month Online + Print Delivery
$31.99
Click here to sign up for our Premium subscription package.
Advertisement - Your ad here
Get Daily Headlines by E-Mail
Sign up for the latest news delivered to your inbox each morning.
Advertisement - Your ad here
Advertisement - Your ad here
Advertisement - Your ad here